AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Devika Maini

CSCI110 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

unless you already code and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSlide ReaderBeginner UnfriendlyMandatory AttendanceUnclear InstructionsLecture Heavy
  • Students with no ; prior experience is treated as the real prerequisite.
  • Lectures are mostly reading PowerPoints with and .
  • because if you are present.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Prior CS students can pass with moderate effort, but and support weak.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Material is intro-level on paper, but teaching style, flowcharts focus, and coders.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Multiple students say labs are graded only if you attend, so .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most recent and uneven treatment of struggling students.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

One student says she is lenient if work looks complete; and mismatched tests.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and reading appear regular but not described as overwhelming; confusion adds hidden effort.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Frequent complaints of , and being unhelpful or rude to beginners.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and tests all matter, with .

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All evidence is in-person CSCI110: , and beginner-hostile tone for many.

Main concern

Beginners report rudeness, unclear teaching, and .

What students said

“ if you already don't have prior experience in coding before.”
CSCI110
“ .”
CSCI110
“ as if you're present.”
CSCI110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students say tests often do not match homework and .

In-class testsLabs graded with attendanceHomework-test mismatch

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests are criticized for not matching labs and lectures; .

Tests mismatch homeworkLab attendance gating
“ and class labs given.”
CSCI110
“Assignments and .”
CSCI110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you already don't have prior experience in coding before.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person CSCI110 reviews with no online sample, focusing on beginner risk and lecture quality. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Beginner Warning

25/100

“If you're a .”

📽️ Slide-Only Lectures

28/100

“ .”

📍

15/100

“ as if you're present.”

🧪 Mismatched Assessments

42/100

“ and class labs given.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Just reads the .
  • .
  • Her wording is vague, but .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Fit

  • if you have no prior programming experience
  • I have prior CS knowledge.
  • Material itself is not difficult, however her teaching style can be challenging for some people.

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Climate

  • She was really rude to me and wasn't understanding.
  • Picks on those who are struggling.
  • but you will need to study!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only 8 recent CSCI110 reviews, but they are detailed and highly consistent on beginner risk and slide-based teaching.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CSCI1108 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 2