AI Rate Professor

Animation

Van Phan

ANIM146 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can self-navigate heavy resources and want blunt industry critiques more than polished lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProIndustry ExperienceResource OverloadHonest CritiquesVideo-Heavy LecturesMixed Clarity
  • Students appreciate industry insight and one-on-one critiques.
  • Others say resources are scattered and lectures lean on YouTube videos.
  • Grades can be strong even when teaching style frustrates students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Students report A, A+, and B grades, but and harsh critiques mean the A is not automatic.

Online includes both easy-module praise and ; in person grades are solid with mixed effort notes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is doable with modules and practice, but organization and critique pressure add friction.

One online review calls modules easy; other reviews stress confusion and rush.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and tags warn that skipping hurts your chance to pass.

Both online and as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; praise for care and critiques is balanced by style complaints.

Online opinions are polarized; in person is mixed but slightly more constructive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some call critiques honest and grades achievable; and .

Format shift

; in person focuses on honest critiques.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Projects and resource volume .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize projects and .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Industry care and critiques help, but lecture clarity and organization drag the experience.

Format shift

Online ranges from inspirational to poor; in person is middling with useful critiques.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Project work, modules, and critiques drive evaluation more than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person, critiques and career resources stand out, but resource organization and group time feel messy.

Main concern

Resources scattered across many places and uneven teaching clarity.

What students said

“Nightmare trying to figure out how to get his resources from five different places.”
ANIM146
“His critiques are honest but not offensive.”
ANIM146

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one student loves motivating modules, another says he plays YouTube, rushes, and critiques harshly.

Main concern

Inconsistent lecture quality and harsh competitive critiques online.

What students said

“Class isn't that difficult and is broken down into easy to do modules.”
ANIM146
“he will teach for about 20 minutes in an 1hr class and will just play videos from YouTube.”
ANIM146

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects, modules, and critiques rather than a .

Project CritiquesModulesParticipation

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person assessment centers on projects and individual critiques rather than described exams.

Student CritiquesGroup WorkProjects
“the and every student.”
ANIM146
“His critiques are honest but not offensive.”
ANIM146

Online

Online comments ; work is module and critique based.

ModulesVideo LecturesHarsh Critiques
“Class isn't that difficult and is broken down into easy to do modules.”
ANIM146
“you will learn but critiques harshly.”
ANIM146

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You can tell in his class structure, and the way he incorporates motivation into every day that he teaches that he really cares about his students success.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting mixed teaching and critique themes. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Care and Motivation

70/100

“he really cares about his students success. Class isn't that difficult and is broken down into easy to do modules.”

📚 Resource Chaos

35/100

“Nightmare trying to figure out how to get his resources from five different places.”

🎬 Lecture Style Risk

30/100

“he will teach for about 20 minutes in an 1hr class and will just play videos from YouTube.”

🗣️ Critique Value

65/100

“His critiques are honest but not offensive.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Inspirational
  • he will just play videos from YouTube
  • His teaching could use more clarity though, but it should click with practice.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Class isn't that difficult
  • you will learn but critiques harshly.

Theme 3

🧰 About Resources and Feedback

  • bomb you with resources
  • critiques he gave each and every student
  • resources that can seem daunting at first

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews with split opinions limit confidence despite useful detail in each comment.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANIM1464 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values