AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Kathleen Dorr

CHILD73 · CHILD10 · CHLD10 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Treat as a risky, poorly documented option; older students found it easy with notes, but recent evidence does not support a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPolarized ReviewsEasy Notes ClassPassionate About KidsDisorganized LecturesSparse Modern Feedback
  • some praise passion and .
  • Almost no modern academic detail; the newest post is a personal attack unrelated to course design.
  • , so recommendation confidence is weak.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Several older comments say study her notes or complete work and you get an A with multiple-choice and matching exams.

Ease evidence is almost entirely from older in person reviews; the sole online review is non-academic.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Students describe an easy child-development class that can feel long but is not intellectually brutal.

In person reviews drive the easiness picture; online has no content-difficulty detail.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, so flexibility cannot be confirmed either way.

Online lists attendance as not mandatory once; in .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

and stale praise make a confident recommend hard.

Neither format offers recent enthusiastic academic recommendations.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Older notes-based exams and complete-your-work guidance suggest approachable grading without modern grade data.

Format shift

In person comments imply fair outcomes; .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Some tags mention papers and tests, while other comments simply say complete the work; .

Format shift

; older in person notes say easy if you do the work.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Passion and entertainment for some students clash with disorganization and .

Format shift

In person reviews are polarized; the online post is personal and not instructional.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mentions of study guides, quizzes, multiple choice, matching, short essays, papers, and .

Format shift

Online tags stress papers and tests; in person mentions quizzes and exams from notes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person CHLD reviews range from passionate easy class with and boring lectures.

Main concern

Reviews are very old and split, so current teaching quality is hard to trust.

What students said

“Her study . , but makes the class entertaining.”
CHLD10
“Kathleen Lynn Dorr is the Worst Professor i have had in Mt.SAC... ..she should not be teaching:(”
CHILD73

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online-tagged review is a personal allegation, not a usable course-experience report.

Main concern

No reliable academic .

What students said

“CHEATED WITH MY HUSBAND while my daughter was attending the pre school in Mt.Sac while she was the director.”
CHILD73

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Older reviews describe standard quiz/exam mixes with .

Study GuidesMultiple ChoiceMatchingShort Essay

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person exams are described as multiple choice, matching, and .

Study GuidesMultiple ChoiceMatchingShort Essay
“Her quiz and , and short essay.”
CHILD10
“Her study .”
CHLD10

Online

Reviews do .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her class is easy. Just study her notes and you'll get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 mostly outdated reviews with mixed praise and sparse modern academic detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“She's loves children and is passionate about the subject. It was a pleasure taking her class.”

👎 Strong Negatives

32/100

“Kathleen Lynn Dorr is the Worst Professor i have had in Mt.SAC... ”

📈 Easy With Notes

76/100

“Her class is easy. Just study her notes and you'll get an A.”

📚 Study Supports

62/100

“Her study .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is the bomb!!!
  • easy class, but not very interesting lectures
  • Nice, knowledgeable.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just study her notes and you'll get an A
  • As long as you complete your work, you will do good
  • Learned a lot and didn't seem like I was sitting through 3 hour class

Theme 3

⚠️ About Trust & Age of Reviews

  • , but makes the class entertaining

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews are mostly 2003-2011, lack grade detail, include empty comments, and one recent personal attack, so reliability is weak.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHLD106 reviews
CHILD102 reviews
CHILD732 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values