AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Anna Degtyareva

COMP11 · CISP34 · CIS31 · CISP21 · CIS15 · CISP10 · CISP31 · CISW31 · CISP24 · CISB · CISB31 · CISP103134 · CISB15 · CISB11 · 66 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
63.64%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and will use office hours; avoid if you need polished lectures from zero.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf Study HeavyHelpful If You AskAccent Divides ClassLots Of LabsHands Off Online
  • Programming courses reward students who read, do labs early, and ask for help; beginners without support often struggle.
  • Online sections are largely self-study through Pearson/Cengage/Canvas with and limited lectures.
  • Office-type classes can be easy, while C++ sequences feel heavy and polarizing on lecture clarity.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

As and assignments are finished, but , and picky auto-graders raise the real effort cost.

Online A grades often come from platform work; in and ++.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

Office apps can be easy, but beginning C++ and compressed terms feel challenging for first-time programmers.

Online Office courses rate easy; online/in person programming .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

and accept skipping if assignments are submitted, though some .

Online is usually non-mandatory; in person hybrid comments say she often does not mind skips when work is in.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

About two-thirds would take again, but and avoid-if-new-to-coding.

and Office ease; in person splits on accent and lecture usefulness.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Clear criteria and recovery help exist, yet tough-grader tags, limited coding attempts, and .

Format shift

Online auto-graders feel picky; in as fair if you ask.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students repeatedly report lots of , and projects, especially in short programming terms.

Format shift

Both formats stress assignment volume; Office online is lighter than CISP programming tracks.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

She is patient and accessible for many, but lectures, accent, and hands-off style .

Format shift

Online is hands-off with few videos; in person quality depends heavily on whether students use her help.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Labs, online textbook coding, projects, and as secondary gates.

Format shift

; in person adds quizzes and board-note-dependent homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In and available, but many call lectures unclear or slow with a strong accent and expect .

Main concern

Beginners who rely only on lectures without reading or tutors report confusion and failure risk.

What students said

“You have to teach yourself everything and read a lot.”
CISP31
“She is the most helpful professor ever!”
CISP24

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online is heavily platform-driven self-study with ; auto-graders can be picky and communication mixed.

Main concern

, and limited lecture videos can tank grades for new programmers.

What students said

“If . Her course uses the Pearson website which has different links for the same textbook”
CISP31
“ videos and .”
CISB15

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams range from lab-based multi-attempt assessments to open-notes quizzes and ; .

Lab Based ExamsMultiple AttemptsOpen Notes QuizzesQuizzes And LabsMultiple Choice Finals

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person comments mention open notes/book quizzes, provided question lists, MC midterms/finals, and ; .

Open Notes QuizzesOpen Book QuizzesMultiple Choice MidtermHigh Point Exam Questions
“most of and open book, and she gives you pretty much the questions she will ask you before a test”
CISP31
“Midterm and and easy.”
CIS15

Online

Online reviews describe lab-based midterms/finals with multiple attempts and textbook .

Lab Based MidtermLab Based FinalThree AttemptsOnline Textbook Coding
“The midterm and the .”
CISB15
“Textbook hw only gives you 3 attempts per coding problem which can be stressful.”
CISP31

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting self-study load, help accessibility, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

54/100

“She's nice n kind, but if you are new to programming and .”

📚 Self Study Reality

46/100

“There are really videos, so you will have to resort to self-teaching to excel in her class.”

❤️ Help When You Ask

70/100

“She is the most helpful professor ever!”

📦 Workload Load

34/100

“There are and quizzes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has an accent that is hard to understand
  • and will help you and work with you till you get it
  • hands-off professor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you put in the effort to understand the concepts in this class, you will get an A
  • You get As pretty easily if you do your work
  • If

Theme 3

💻 About Online Platforms

  • videos and
  • The , but they are solvable

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

66

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years and , and lab themes with enough detail and grade reports.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 517
3 out of 58
2 out of 59
1 out of 59

Course coverage

CISP3124 reviews
CISP107 reviews
CIS314 reviews
CIS153 reviews
CISB153 reviews
Show 9 more courses
CISB1 review
CISB111 review
CISB311 review
CISP1031341 review
CISP211 review
CISP241 review
CISP341 review
CISW311 review
COMP111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 5 · A 9

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2