AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Tony Rivas

COUNCIL2 · COUN1 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Proceed with caution; experiences range .

Best fit · DependsPolarizingRude to someHarsh grader for someAwesome to othersTalks down
  • Reviews split hard between love and strong dislike for the same counseling courses.
  • Some call him awesome and ; others call him rude, disrespectful, and harsh.
  • Attendance and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Grades range from A+ to F and D-; some praise ease while .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty ratings span 1 to 5 with no consistent story on content challenge.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

; others list attendance not mandatory.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

About 60% would take again with strong fans and strong detractors.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Split reports of A+ and failing marks.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Light

65/100

Little mention of ; focus is interpersonal and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Equal intensity of awesome praise and rude, disrespectful criticism.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments rarely detail assessment mix beyond harsh or .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Depends

three glowing short praises versus two harsh reports of rudeness and talking down to students.

Main concern

Personality clash risk; some students feel disrespected or harshly graded.

What students said

“This professor was sooooo rude! He grades very harshly and speaks down to people!”
COUNCIL2
“Horrible counselor. Disrespectful and talks down to people including his own coworkers.”
COUN1
“I had Tony Rivas for counseling he is an awesome as a professor!”
COUNCIL2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a .

Limited exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy; .

“He grades very harshly and speaks down to people!”
COUNCIL2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If ! He is the worst! I thought counselors were supposed to help students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews highlighting a sharp love-hate split. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚡ Polarizing Reputation

50/100

“I had Tony Rivas for counseling he is an awesome as a professor!”

😤 Rudeness Risk

25/100

“This professor was sooooo rude! He grades very harshly and speaks down to people!”

👍 Recommendation Split

55/100

“I love Hi!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he is an awesome professor
  • I love Hi!
  • Awesome

Theme 2

😠 About Character

  • sooooo rude
  • talks down to people
  • Disrespectful and talks down to people including his own coworkers

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • He grades very harshly
  • A+ outcomes for some
  • F and D- for others

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews over several years show a ; sample is moderate but highly inconsistent.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

COUNCIL24 reviews
COUN11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values