AI Rate Professor

Physics

Angela Jensvold

PHY2AG · PHYSSECT · ASTR5 · PHYS2AG · PHYSICS · PHYS101 · PHYSICS1A · PHYSICS1 · ASTRO · PHYS1 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

; only consider if you can fully self-teach physics and still risk a rough grade experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCannot teachInsane examsAvoid at all costsHeavy workloadNice but ineffective
  • Nearly all students report she cannot teach physics clearly and lectures feel useless.
  • and are described as unfair and extreme.
  • Workload and labs are heavy while help in class is rare, so most urge dropping her.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Comments , and rare As despite heavy effort.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Physics content plus vague lectures, fast or off-topic talk, and misaligned assessments make the course feel extremely hard.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, though one older review said lecture must be attended and many call lectures a waste of time.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Would-take-again is 0% and the overwhelming .

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

, and unfair quizzes or exams dominate student reports.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Students cite so much work, papers, labs, and stress that some report dropping or extreme burnout.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

but cannot teach, confuses answers, and wastes lecture time.

Format shift

; a few outlier glowing posts do not match the majority.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Quizzes, modules, labs, homework, and high-stakes tests all matter, with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person physics sections are widely described as , and high stress with almost no recommendation to re-enroll.

Main concern

Exams and , and many say you learn little despite heavy work.

What students said

“ .”
PHYSICS1
“ or modules.”
PHYS2AG
“ . Even if it means waiting another semester!”
PHYS2AG

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes feel easy while and poorly aligned with .

Misaligned testsEasy quizzes false securityHard curveIn-person exams

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as unrelated to taught material and extremely hard.

Misaligned testsEasy quizzes false securityHard curve
“ as well are the modules, but the ”
PHYS2AG
“The test passing rate was curved to 20-30% because everyone was failing.”
PHY2AG

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Even if it means waiting another semester!”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2024, highlighting consistent teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“Just don't. You'll spend more time wondering why she is still teaching rather than learning the material.”

👩‍🏫 Teaching Quality

20/100

“She is a nice lady, but cannot teach.”

📝

25/100

“ or modules.”

📚 Workload Stress

15/100

“So. Much. Work. I am bewildered how someone like this can be hired.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are a waste of time. She doesn't even cover the material.
  • her clarity sucks
  • She does not teach.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • the and there is almost nothing used to prepare you for them
  • grades horrible. quizes and
  • unless you have a tutor.

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality

  • and sort of funny but she needs to work on her teaching skills.
  • SHes a ... Horrible teacher

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

27 in-person reviews span many years with consistent low quality ratings and .

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 510
1 out of 512

Course coverage

PHYS2AG12 reviews
PHYS13 reviews
PHYSICS3 reviews
PHY2AG2 reviews
PHYSICS12 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ASTR51 review
ASTRO1 review
PHYS1011 review
PHYSICS1A1 review
PHYSSECT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values