AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Sacramento Mendoza-Ramos

SOC5 · SOC20 · SOC1 · SOC2 · SOC107 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take him if and will follow rubrics carefully; expect .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderLecture heavyExtra creditParticipation mattersInspirational discussions
  • In-person lectures can be engaging and .
  • Many call him a and presentations.
  • Online and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

and dropped exams help, but .

Online has both easy-A and ; in person stresses rubrics and papers.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard sociology with heavy lectures and writing, interesting but not light.

Online Ethnic Studies feels lighter; core SOC1 in person feels heavier.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and stress required class engagement.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

About half love his discussions and care; and dull lectures.

In-person opinions split; online is similarly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Repeated tough-grader tags and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize harsh .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Papers, presentations, worksheets, and all.

Format shift

Online SOC1 notes lots of homework; SOC20 online is lighter modules.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Kind and inspirational for some, boring and unengaging for others, with uneven online delivery.

Format shift

In person praised more for discussions; online quality is less consistent.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of long multiple-choice tests with short answers, papers, discussions, and group work.

Format shift

Both formats use writing plus tests; online leans discussion boards and reflections.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In and discussion-driven with lectures, papers, tests, and , but can feel boring or picky.

Main concern

and lecture-heavy pace with mandatory participation.

What students said

“He was a really kind and understanding teacher, even with deadlines.”
SOC107
“He is a and presentations but if you follow the rubric you should be fine!”
SOC1
“He doesn't know how to teach. His class is very boring”
SOC1

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and easy A claims to tough grading and mediocre teaching.

Main concern

and uneven online teaching quality.

What students said

“ !”
SOC20
“ .”
SOC1
“Mediocre teacher during in-person classes and even worse as an online teacher.”
SOC5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are conventional with moderate difficulty; .

Multiple choice midterm/finalShort answerPop quizzesDiscussion boards

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person midterms and ; pop quizzes appear in older reviews.

Long multiple choice testsShort answerPop quizzesPapers and presentations
“ and took long multiple choice tests with short answer responses at the end for midterm and final.”
SOC107
“he does not understand that nobody is going ”
SOC1

Online

, and reflection papers; proctoring is not clearly described.

Canvas modulesDiscussion boardsReflection papers
“the class and we write discussion boards and reflections papers”
SOC20
“The . Pay attention to things he repeats & dates!”
SOC2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a and presentations but if you follow the rubric you should be fine!”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews across online and in-person sections, balancing tough grading with discussion praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝

34/100

“ .”

🗣️ Discussion Driven

70/100

“his ”

⭐ Helps

68/100

“he offers LOTS of and ”

👍 Sometimes Easy Online

75/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures were heavy but interesting and made you want to learn.
  • Sacramento is very thoughtful and thought provoking.
  • His class is very boring, because he doesn't show passion

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • !
  • if you follow the !

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Most of the classes were pure lectures and we occasionally did worksheets.
  • The .
  • So many papers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

10 reviews with both formats and mixed grades give a usable but still limited picture.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

SOC15 reviews
SOC202 reviews
SOC1071 review
SOC21 review
SOC51 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values