AI Rate Professor

Economics

Ahmed Abdel-Rahman

BUSC7 · BUSC1B · BUSINMACR · BUSC1A · BUSC1BH · BUS1A · BUSC1 · MACRO1A · ECONOMICS · ECON15 · BUS1B · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
58.33%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take him if and use ; skip if you need dynamic lecturing.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPowerPoint HeavyWants You to PassExtra CreditTest HeavyMixed Personality
  • and dry PowerPoint reader who cannot teach.
  • Grades often lean B-range with , , and replaceable exams.
  • Success usually means studying slides and the book; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

74/100

Many report curves, large , , and even 78 percent counting as an A if you put in solid study.

; online still requires reading and sparse high-weight work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Economics content is average difficulty; lectures help some, but many must learn from the book and slides.

Online is harder because teaching is thinner; style.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

as crucial to the grade, others say .

In-person comments conflict on mandatory vs optional; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

great if you want a if you want strong lectures.

In-person recommendations are mixed; both online reviews are negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Frequent , , grade averaging, and comments that he wants students to pass.

Format shift

In-person shows more leniency; .

Workload

Moderate

56/100

and occasional papers; not overwhelming for most.

Format shift

Online can feel sparse but ; and reading heavy.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Caring and and sarcasm for others; overall middling.

Format shift

In-person is polarized; online students mostly feel abandoned to the textbook.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Multiple-choice quizzes and , and occasional projects.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize tests; online has fewer assignments and more book-based quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person swings from great caring professor with tests and personality friction.

Main concern

Lecture quality is inconsistent and exams can feel disconnected from class.

What students said

“Professor was so . he was willing to help”
BUS1A
“Horrible teacher, did not grade any of the homework. Just gives everyone B's”
MACRO1A
“he really wants you to pass the class”
BUSC1A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

read the book, do sparse graded work, and .

Main concern

Minimal instruction and .

What students said

“You have to do everything by yourself. You need to read the textbook by yourself”
BUSC1A
“By far the . I would not suggest taking any of his courses”
ECON15

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Typical econ MC quizzes and tests drawn heavily from PowerPoints and the book, sometimes with .

Multiple Choice ExamsPowerPoint BasedExtra Credit QuizzesOnline QuizzesOccasional Open Notes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams are often 50-question MC from slides, with , and rare open-notes items.

50 Question MC TestsPowerPoint BasedExtra CreditBonus Exam Replace
“5 tests 50 multiple choice questions”
BUSC1A
“Easy A(78%=A),enjoy!”
BUSC1BH
“3exams(50mult choice& 1 is open notes)”
BUSC1

Online

Online work is textbook questions and quizzes with limited guidance; .

Textbook Self-StudyFew AssignmentsOnline Quizzes
“You need to read the textbook by yourself and answer the questions from the textbook”
BUSC1A
“The and the assignments are annoying. ”
ECON15

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He wants his students to pass. Even he admits it's a tough subject. Just suck it up, review your class notes and you'll be fine.”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews (2 online, 37 in person), highlighting polarization on teaching and curves. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

54/100

“He doesn't really teach, just reads off the and tends to go off track”

🎁

70/100

“Easy A(78%=A),enjoy!”

❤️ Caring Side

75/100

“Professor was so . he was willing to help”

👎 Online Experience

25/100

“ automated and you could ask your queries to Chat-GPT”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • just reads off the
  • he really wants you to pass the class
  • Sitting through his powerpoint is extremely useless

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy A(78%=A),enjoy!
  • Even if you get 47% avg. you can get up to a C grade
  • his weekly 50 mc exams were hard for me

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • You have to do everything by yourself
  • I would not suggest taking any of his courses
  • !!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

39 reviews across many years show a stable split pattern on teaching quality and .

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 58
3 out of 56
2 out of 57
1 out of 57

Course coverage

BUSC1A19 reviews
BUS1A5 reviews
BUSC1B4 reviews
MACRO1A3 reviews
BUS1B2 reviews
Show 6 more courses
BUSC11 review
BUSC1BH1 review
BUSC71 review
BUSINMACR1 review
ECON151 review
ECONOMICS1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1