AI Rate Professor

English & Literature

Jill Wright

ENGL67 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

In-person ENGL67 can be a caring, low-cost win for many students, but the recent online experience was harmful—vet carefully if you need ACCESS support.

Best fit · Budget FirstInspirational for deaf studentsHomemade textbookNo late workPolarizing online vs in personQuick grading
  • , and a free homemade textbook.
  • One recent online review is highly negative about feeling unwanted and earning an F.
  • Attendance and late work are strict; experience may depend heavily on format and student needs.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

In-person students call the class very easy with , though the online F review shows grades are not automatic.

; the online review reports failure and high difficulty.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Multiple in-person comments say easy class and light difficulty, while one online review rated difficulty very high.

In-person evidence is easy; online evidence is much harder and more negative.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and .

; in-person notes no late work.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

, but the recent online review strongly does not.

In-person is highly positive; online is a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

In-person students report easy class and ; one online student failed and felt poorly treated.

Format shift

Leniency is clearer in .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Tags include lots of , and reading, but other comments call the class very easy.

Format shift

Online tags stress heavy work; older in-person comments stress ease.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Most reviews praise care, inspiration, and helpfulness, undercut by one recent online experience of feeling unwanted.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is strong; online review is sharply negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Papers, reading, tests, and all appear across reviews without a single dominant mode.

Format shift

Online tags are test/paper heavy; form.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Budget First

In-person ENGL67 yet strict, with easy class and a money-saving homemade textbook.

Main concern

Will not accept late work and expects reading, so lagging behind is risky.

What students said

“An AMAZING PROFESSOR!! she cares about her students and .. she supplies a homemade textbook so you save money!”
ENGL67
“SHE IS A GOOD PROFESSOR FUN AND STRICT ALSO SHE'S FRIENDLY ALSO WONT ACCEPT LATE WORK.”
ENGL67

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online ENGL67 review is strongly negative: student felt unwanted, stopped attending, and .

Main concern

Student felt unwelcome and reported a very poor, high-difficulty online experience ending in F.

What students said

“This professor was very horrible to me, she made me feel unwanted in that class which made me upset and not want to go to that class anymore.”
ENGL67

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring details; online tags stress tests and papers while and no late work.

Test heavy tags onlineExtra creditNo late workReading-focused

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments focus on easy class, quick grading, , and no .

Extra creditQuick gradingNo late work
“the class is very easy and she grades very quickly!”
ENGL67
“WONT ACCEPT LATE WORK”
ENGL67

Online

Online review tags lots of , and test heavy, but .

Test heavyLots of homeworkSo many papers
“ if you are part of ACCESS.”
ENGL67

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“An AMAZING PROFESSOR!! she cares about her students and .. she supplies a homemade textbook so you save money!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (1 online, 3 in person) spanning 2011-2023, highlighting format contrast. Credibility rating: Medium.

💰 Budget Friendly Materials

85/100

“she supplies a homemade textbook so you save money!”

💔 Online Experience Risk

20/100

“she made me feel unwanted in that class which made me upset and not want to go to that class anymore.”

❤️ In-Person Support

90/100

“she cares about her students and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • An AMAZING PROFESSOR!!
  • FUN AND STRICT ALSO SHE'S FRIENDLY
  • she wants were goal deaf people can do it equality with hearing people

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the class is very easy and she grades very quickly!
  • WONT ACCEPT LATE WORK
  • Lots of homework, So

Theme 3

⚠️ Online vs In Person

  • if you are part of ACCESS.
  • I RECOMMAND TAKING HER FOR THIS COURSE
  • she made me feel unwanted in that class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews span 2011-2023 with ; small sample but detailed and time-spread.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL674 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values