AI Rate Professor

Biology

Sumana Pasala

BIO4 · MICRO22 · MIC22 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take only if you can self-advocate and and strict grading; skip if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesTough graderLots of homeworkInconsistent accessibilityExtra credit
  • strong lectures for and
  • , and limited curves reported
  • Attendance and textbook use vary; serious students who work hard can succeed

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Grades cluster around B/B+ with , and last-minute projects, so an A takes serious sustained effort.

Online and in-person both flag tough grading; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings sit mid-to-high with reading-heavy lectures and but not extreme theory either.

Evidence is mostly in-person; the single online review also rates difficulty high.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

and scold lateness; others report attendance not mandatory.

In-person reports both mandatory and ; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

; others say run away over accessibility and grading.

Positive in-person lecture praise contrasts with matching negative online and in-person inaccessibility complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Tough-grader tags, pass-or-fail feel, barely curves for some, while a and .

Format shift

Online review stresses inconsiderate grading; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of homework, lecture-heavy, multiple exams, and .

Format shift

Both formats report heavy HW; online also notes a last-minute project.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Amazing lectures and ; others cite boring labs, lateness, and ignored emails.

Format shift

; online review is strongly negative on accessibility.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

, and study-guide mismatch dominate; HW and projects also matter.

Format shift

In-person and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person bio4 and micro reviews split between amazing lectures with and , and tough exams.

Main concern

Mixed accessibility and ; some report curves and and lateness.

What students said

“She is very clear with her expectation and .”
bio4
“Any serious student who does put work in this class will be successful.”
MICRO22
“I sent her about 4 emails this semester and ”
bio4

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One Winter 2021 online MICRO22 review warns against taking her , and rushed exams.

Main concern

more questions.

What students said

“ ! Shes inaccessible to students and doesnt reply to emails. Very inconsiderate with .”
MICRO22

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams often feel hard, under-timed, and only lightly curved, with little student-friendly format evidence.

Multiple examsTight time limitsMore questions than peersLimited curveStudy guide mismatch

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

study guides, with mixed reports of curves.

Difficult examsStudy guide mismatchSome exam curves
“ and dont follow ”
bio4
“ ”
bio4

Online

Online review reports less time and more questions so you may not finish the test.

Tight timed examsHeavy exam load
“Gives less time and more questions for upcoming exams so you might .”
MICRO22

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! Shes inaccessible to students and doesnt reply to emails. Very inconsiderate with .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews (1 online, 6 in , and accessibility themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“This professor was awesome with awesome lectures”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“Awesome choice”

⚖️

32/100

“Very inconsiderate with .”

📚 Heavy Workload

28/100

“Lots of hw and a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very clear with her expectation and .
  • This professor was awesome with awesome lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Any serious student who does put work in this class will be successful.
  • and dont follow
  • Gives less time and more questions for upcoming exams so you might .

Theme 3

📧 About Accessibility

  • I sent her about 4 emails this semester and
  • Shes inaccessible to students and
  • CONSTANTLY late to class and scolds students for being late.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews from 2021-2023 with detailed but polarized comments; small sample and one near-duplicate negative pair limit certainty.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

bio43 reviews
MICRO223 reviews
MIC221 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values