AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Ken Miller

CNET · CNET56 · CNET50 · CNET4191 · CNET54 · ELEC50 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take him in person for strong CNET teaching; online is workable if you self-advocate, but note the bias concerns.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesFair graderHands-on labsLecture heavyOnline mixed
  • In-person CNET students praise clear, funny, real-world lectures and .
  • course is doable if you finish weekly work, but two allege bias against female and Asian students.
  • and points-based; show effort and use study guides for tests.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Do the weekly work, study his guides, and and .

Online and ; grade data is sparse but effort-based.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

if you keep up, though lectures pack a lot of material.

Both formats rate difficulty low to moderate; in-person covers more volume in class.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and missing class is costly.

Online is self-paced style with weekly due work; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Strong in-person love for teaching and and mixed take-again data.

; online recommendations are weaker and conflicted.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

Described as a and effort on labs.

Format shift

Online and .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

tests; manageable if you stay current.

Format shift

Online stresses weekly posts and labs; in-person adds dense lectures and hands-on labs.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

In-person students call lectures excellent, funny, and industry-relevant; online teaching quality is more mixed.

Format shift

In-person praise is near-unanimous; two online reviews give quality 1 over support bias.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and two major tests with study guides.

Format shift

Online leans on weekly assignments and exams; , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

funny, concise, real-world, with and useful study guides.

Main concern

A lot is packed into lectures so missing class hurts, and you must study for the .

What students said

“ ! Lectures are great and .”
CNET54
“ . and funny as well.”
CNET50
“Quite possibly the one of the best professor in the whole CNET program.”
CNET56

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Straightforward weekly assignments, discussions, and ; but multiple reports of unequal engagement with female and Asian students.

Main concern

Reports that he mainly engages male students and offers little support to female or Asian students.

What students said

“Just demonstrate that you at least and discussions in advance. He is a .”
CNET
“He provides weekly office hours, but does not assist Asian or female students.”
CNET50
“The only downfall is this Professor only engages with male students.”
CNET

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are substantial but guided by his study materials; not described as open-book or heavily proctored.

Two big testsStudy guidesWeekly quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Two big tests with focused study guides; .

Two big testsStudy guidesPoints-based final grade
“There are , but his study guide hones in on the topics addressed.”
CNET50

Online

Online mentions exams due on schedule with weekly work; .

Timed completion expectedWeekly exams or tasks
“Do the , and .”
CNET

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! Lectures are great and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews (3 online, 8 in person), , and online bias concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Quite possibly the one of the best professor in the whole CNET program.”

⚖️

72/100

“He is a .”

⚠️ Online Support Concerns

25/100

“Throughout the entire semester, he only engages and offers advice to male students about anything tech-related.”

👍 Recommendation

72/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are great and .
  • A LOT of information is packed into his lectures, but he is concise and illustrative.
  • Gives a very detailed and thorough lecture.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • If you do the work, the course is easy.
  • , and there are plenty available with .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Experience

  • He only engages with male students.
  • does not assist Asian or female students.
  • He grades fairly, but don't expect any support or advice from him.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

11 reviews spanning 2012-2023 with and consistent in-person praise, but limited grade data and older bulk of reviews.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CNET504 reviews
CNET3 reviews
CNET41911 review
CNET541 review
CNET561 review
Show 1 more courses
ELEC501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1