AI Rate Professor

Aeronautics

Robert Rogus

AERO25 · FARS · AEROSECT · AEROAERO · AERO29 · AIRT41 · AERO24 · AERO025 · AEROINST · TRAN17 · AVIATION · AERO30 · AERO40 · AERONAV · AERO23 · AIRT42 · AEROAIRT · AERO150 · AEROANDAIRT · AERO252 · AERO250 · 51 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
36.36%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Avoid if you need structured instruction; if you can teach yourself and just need an easy pass.

Best fit · Self Taught ProOff-topic storytellerSelf-study requiredTest-heavy Gleim prepDisorganized pacingNice but weak teaching
  • Many say he is likable yet poor at structured teaching and stays off syllabus.
  • Passing is often easy if .
  • Serious aviation students frequently advise waiting for other instructors.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many call exams predictable from Gleim or light work; but grades are achievable.

The single online review explicitly says Easy A; in person also often reports easy grades with self-study.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Content is not always hard, but poor teaching and disorganization force self-learning that can feel harder than it is.

Online one review is moderate difficulty; in person difficulty ratings swing with how much self-teaching is needed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; class value is often low so attendance feels optional to learning.

; in person mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

and many urge waiting for other aero professors despite some older positive notes.

Online student still said yes for easy A; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

, and easy A reports offset occasional mean late policies.

Format shift

Online called Easy A; in person often lenient if .

Workload

Light

70/100

, then piles up; many weeks feel low effort until exam crunch.

Format shift

Online noted three weeks with no work; in person often sparse then end-loaded.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Repeated complaints of off-topic rambles, YouTube, and weak concept delivery despite aviation passion.

Format shift

nice guy, weak instruction.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Quizzes, midterms, and with limited projects.

Format shift

Online tagged test heavy; in .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In person he is often off topic with flying stories and videos; grades can be fair if .

Main concern

You may leave without real instruction and .

What students said

“Robert is a nice person but a horrible instructor please do your self a favor and .”
AERO250
“Doesnt teach. Hes a but an awful professor.”
AERO150
“Study the commercial pilot gleim questions and you will be golden for the exams and quizzes.”
AERO25

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

One online review calls him laid-back and an easy A but says you learn little and lectures wander.

Main concern

Little learning and inconsistent weekly work.

What students said

“Professor Rogus is a lay back professor but you do not learn anything.”
AERO252

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes often pull directly from Gleim or prior quizzes, so .

Gleim-based questionsMultiple choice quizzesTest heavyOccasional take-home essay

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In ; some include short essays and can feel inconsistent.

Gleim questionsMultiple choiceQuiz heavyTake-home essay portions
“90% of .”
AERO25
“Since nearly all of the hard for the exam.”
AERO25

Online

One online review marks the class test heavy with few graded items and an easy A despite weak teaching.

Test heavyGraded by few thingsEasy A
“Easy A though.”
AERO252

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Robert is a nice person but a horrible instructor please do your self a favor and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, weighing long-running self-teach and off-topic themes. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Doesnt teach. Hes a but an awful professor.”

📚

40/100

“If you want to learn anything either be ready to teach yourself or go to the tutors.”

🅰️ Easy Pass Potential

78/100

“Easy A though.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures often wonder a little bit
  • He tends to wander off topic frequently
  • Half the time he is off topic on youtube

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A though.
  • Study the commercial pilot gleim questions and you will be golden
  • He's pretty easy!!!!!!!!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Recommendations

  • .
  • If you can just hold off and wait for Russ Calverley
  • !!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

51

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with a stable theme of .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 57
3 out of 57
2 out of 56
1 out of 513

Course coverage

AERO258 reviews
AERO247 reviews
AERO2507 reviews
AERO304 reviews
AERO2523 reviews
Show 16 more courses
AERO0252 reviews
AERO1502 reviews
AERO232 reviews
AERO402 reviews
AERONAV2 reviews
AERO291 review
AEROAERO1 review
AEROAIRT1 review
AEROANDAIRT1 review
AEROINST1 review
AEROSECT1 review
AIRT411 review
AIRT421 review
AVIATION1 review
FARS1 review
TRAN171 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1