AI Rate Professor

Art History

Thomas O'Leary

AHIS6 · AHIS1 · AHIS5 · ARTH9 · HIST9 · ART9 · AHIS9 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

In person he can be a workable art-history option if you memorize hard; recent online sections look poorly supported.

Best fit · Effort For RewardSlide MemorizationFlexible GraderDry LecturesTextbook HeavySparse Online Materials
  • Older in-person art history reviews often call him passable or easy if .
  • and book content.
  • Recent online reviews criticize thin materials, multi-campus overload, and weak lecture support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Several students call him flexible or easy and report As, but and .

Easy-A and ; online is harder to complete without materials.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is standard art history with heavy memorization rather than advanced theory.

; online feels harder due to thin support.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

; one online review .

; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

easy pass; recent online reviews warn against thin teaching.

; recent online reviews are negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Multiple students say he is flexible, gives partial credit, and .

Format shift

; online grading detail is thin.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Expect , and a couple of papers rather than light busywork.

Format shift

In-person workload is memorization-heavy; online adds multi-part research discussions.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

and sparks interest; others call lectures dry, um-filled, and .

Format shift

In-person quality is mixed-positive; online teaching support is criticized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

Midterms, finals, quizzes, and slide IDs dominate; papers exist but .

Format shift

Exam and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Older in-person reviews say the class is doable with lecture notes and delivery.

Main concern

Lots of memorization and .

What students said

“he isn't interesting, but he is EASY.it's a really chill class overall.”
AHIS9
“ .”
AHIS5
“This class is very passable as long as you pay attention during lecture and make sure to memorize whatever paintings he gives prior to the exams.”
AHIS6

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Recent online classes feel under-supported with , and powerpoints without real lectures.

Main concern

Insufficient notes and materials force heavy independent research.

What students said

“Overall it lacks proper materials for students.”
ARTH9
“ , just provided no explaining powerpoint.”
AHIS1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and book material, with quizzes and papers alongside.

Slide MemorizationMidterm and FinalMultiple Choice QuizzesResearch Paper

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

book-based questions; quizzes are multiple choice.

Slide MemorizationMidterm and FinalMultiple Choice Quizzes
“For art pieces you need to memorize.”
AHIS5
“Write pieces to remember on index cards to study for exams. You need to remember them. A must! .”
AHIS6
“ and final), but he's easy with grading.”
AHIS9

Online

Online reviews do not clearly describe proctoring; they focus on weak prep materials for assessments.

Multi-part Discussions
“I had a tough time completing the provided very little material/notes for.”
ARTH9

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he isn't interesting, but he is EASY.it's a really chill class overall.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews (2 online, 10 in , and online material gaps. Credibility rating: Medium.

🖼️

48/100

“For art pieces you need to memorize.”

⚖️

74/100

“ . I've written , yet i get partial credit for it.”

💻 Weak Online Support

40/100

“ , just provided no explaining powerpoint.”

😴 Dry Lecture Style

52/100

“Lectures are dry and consist of a lot of umms”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • so that you would understand what's going on.
  • Lectures are dry and consist of a lot of umms
  • , just provided no explaining powerpoint.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • he isn't interesting, but he is EASY.
  • very easy.
  • and final), but he's easy with grading.

Theme 3

📚 About Study Method

  • make sure to memorize whatever paintings he gives prior to the exams.
  • Write pieces to remember on index cards to study for exams.
  • You will need to do a lot of online research in order to keep up.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews exist, but most in-person comments are from 2009-2010 while online critiques are recent, reducing consistency over time.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AHIS12 reviews
AHIS52 reviews
AHIS62 reviews
AHIS92 reviews
ARTH92 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ART91 review
HIST91 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1