AI Rate Professor

Communication

Jordan Sandoval

Courses not reported · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Good pick for a light, fun speech class if and occasional inconsistency.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyFunnyUnderstandingHilariousInconsistent on CanvasPaper-only submissions
  • Many students find him funny, understanding, and easy for speech class.
  • A strong minority report inconsistent Canvas answers and rigid paper-before-class turn-in rules.
  • ; difficulty is generally low when the experience clicks.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Two students report A's with low difficulty and easy collaboration; curves.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Speech course described as fun and easy with low difficulty ratings for most reviewers.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

Two enthusiastic yes votes and but lean-positive outlook.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students who completed the course report easy understanding and A's; complaints focus on policy consistency more than harsh scoring.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Light

75/100

Described as fun and easy with group projects and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Funny and understanding for most; undermined by reports of inconsistent answers and rigid submission rules.

Format shift

In-person only; quality ratings are 5, 5, and 1.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Speech work, participation, group projects, and talk.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Mostly warm, funny, easy speech course with two strong A's, offset by one scathing review on inconsistency and paper-only policies.

Main concern

and refusal to accept digital submissions.

What students said

“Professor Sandoval is funny and understanding. Made speech fun, not much more you could ask for.”
40732
“very understanding and easy to work with”
40732
“ .”
40732

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize paper submissions before class rather than traditional proctored exams.

Paper-only submissions

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

He requires paper work before class and ; broader exam proctoring is not clearly described.

Paper-only submissionsIn-person turn-in before class
“He requires everything to be turned in on paper BEFORE class starts and refuses to .”
40732

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Sandoval is funny and understanding. Made speech fun, not much more you could ask for.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, balancing fun easy-class praise with logistics complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

😂 Fun Speech Class

68/100

“Made speech fun, not much more you could ask for.”

⚠️ Policy Inconsistency

30/100

“He is very and frequently gives different students different answers”

👍 Easy To Work With

80/100

“very understanding and easy to work with”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • funny and understanding
  • Hilarious
  • Made speech fun

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • very understanding and easy to work with
  • 1
  • A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Logistics

  • refuses to
  • .
  • gives different students different answers to the same question

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Three recent 2022 in-person reviews with but conflicting conclusions keep confidence moderate.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

407323 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values