AI Rate Professor

Economics

Ahmad Rahman

MICRO1B · BUSC1B · BUSA1 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless you have no other option; the rare online praise does not outweigh consistent test and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnreliable syllabusTests off materialTough graderHomework never perfectClear online only
  • and tests misaligned with lectures and the book.
  • One online review praises an easy pass if you turn in work; .
  • Syllabus changes, last-minute notices, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Online one student says you pass by submitting work, but in person tough homework scoring and .

The only Easy-pass claim is from the single online review; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content itself is not always described as advanced, but mismatched tests and alone.

Online reviewer called it easy; and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

and others do not, with no strong consensus on flexibility.

; online review said attendance was not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students would not take , and .

The lone online review recommends him; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tags and comments , and quizzes that feel unfair.

Format shift

Online review saw clear criteria; .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

as endless, with and frequent quizzes.

Format shift

Workload complaints are strongest in in-person BUSA1 comments.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

, and lectures or slides that do not match assessments.

Format shift

Online experience is rated highly; in-person quality ratings cluster at 1-2.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades lean on homework, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize quizzes and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students report quizzes from uncovered , and syllabus inconsistencies.

Main concern

Tests and assigned book.

What students said

“ . Chapters not yet covered in class, and some that would never be covered.”
BUSA1
“ the book.”
MICRO1B
“His syllabus stated that all 5 discussions will be and him, later on, explains discussions are for practice purposes only”
BUSC1B

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Single online review calls him easy with a and a guaranteed pass if work and .

Main concern

Only one online review, so the positive experience may not generalize.

What students said

“There is no way you will not pass if you are turning in your work and .”
BUSC1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments often feel misaligned with .

Quizzes beyond covered chaptersTests not matching slides or bookHomework-heavy grading

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests pull from uncovered or never-covered material.

Off-syllabus quizzesTests unrelated to slides/book
“ .”
BUSA1
“ the book.”
MICRO1B

Online

Online reviewer focuses on quizzes and submitted work as the pass path; .

QuizzesSubmit work to pass
“There is no way you will not pass if you are turning in your work and .”
BUSC1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ dealing with. Every quiz drew from beyond what we read.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (1 online, 4 in and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Test are NOT related to his powerpoints or the book. .”

👎 Recommendation

20/100

“ ”

⚖️

28/100

“Never gave a perfect score on the homework.”

📝 Assessment Alignment

32/100

“ . Chapters not yet covered in class.”

Theme 1

📉

  • .
  • the book.
  • the

Theme 2

📋 About Syllabus Reliability

  • His syllabus stated that all 5 discussions will be
  • Isn't reliable and notify at the last moment

Theme 3

💻 About Online Exception

  • This professor is easy and his syllabus is straight forward.
  • I took him despise his low rating and !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed reviews span 2019-2022 with consistent in-person complaints, but the tiny sample and single online voice limit certainty.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

BUSA12 reviews
BUSC1B2 reviews
MICRO1B1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1