AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Anthony Henry

CHILD10 · CHILD11 · CHLD10 · CHILD2185 · CHLD11 · CHLDCH64 · CHILD1 · CHLD1 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
76.92%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you will keep up with observations and homework; .

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesCaringGroup projectsClear grading criteriaStudy-guide exams
  • Warm, funny, organized Child Development instructor with strong lectures and study guides
  • , and a research paper
  • Online COVID-era sections drew more complaints about vague guidelines and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many say easy A if you follow the syllabus, but grades range into B/C and some online students felt harshly graded.

and mixed outcomes; in-person leans easier with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

and study guides, though reading and papers add load.

and papers; in-person described as easy if you show up and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

as optional, others as and due days.

; evidence is mixed overall.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and care, tempered by online complaints and workload intensity.

In-person recommendations are stronger; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Often described as fair or not a hard grader with , though a few call him a .

Format shift

Online includes tough-grader comments; in-person mostly lenient and clear.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, and a multi-page research paper create steady work.

Format shift

Online students especially note lots of reading and papers; in-person workload is moderate if timed well.

Teaching experience

Good

86/100

; occasional bland or intense lecture pacing.

Format shift

In-person teaching praised highly; online quality more mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and a research paper.

Format shift

Both formats use exams and written work; online emphasizes discussion boards.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praise clear , and fair grading if you do observations and homework.

Main concern

Attendance and timely observations matter; end-of-term work can pile up.

What students said

“Lectures were interesting & .”
CHILD1
“As long as you do the study guides he gives you, the .”
CHLD10
“anyone who abides by his rules and guidelines can get an eassyy peassey A.”
CHILD1

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online CHILD1/11 mixed: some call it easy with and no Zoom, others , and a long research paper.

Main concern

Vague directions and students.

What students said

“His guidelines are vague and doesnt really give direction.”
CHILD1
“Probably the best child 1 professor. .”
CHILD1
“overall it was kinda interesting but too much for an online class”
CHILD1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams usually track study guides and PowerPoints; .

Study guidesPowerPoint-basedSometimes open notes3 exams

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; occasional tricky similar answer choices require careful notes.

Study guidesPowerPoint-basedSometimes open notes
“As long as you do the study guides he gives you, the .”
CHLD10
“ and you can ask for help without embaressment.”
CHILD1

Online

Online sections report three exams and discussion boards; .

3 examsDiscussion boardsStudy list mismatch
“he gives you a list of things you should study for but half of them aren't on the exam.”
CHILD1
“3 exams and discussion boards. Easy class.”
CHILD1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“really good teacher. the clear and fair with all the assignments. he gives the exact instructions for and anyone who abides by his rules and guidelines can get an eassyy peassey A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews (4 online, 23 in-person), highlighting lectures, workload, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“GREAT Professor! Awesome guy! and knowledgeable in what he teaches.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“ !”

📝 Workload Reality

55/100

“a lot of work though but .”

⚠️ Online Caution

45/100

“ !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is funny and approachable.
  • and knowledgeable

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy pass.
  • He isn't a .

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • does give out a lot of homework
  • the observations as well as the child study consisting of 10 pages but super easy just time consuming
  • too much for an online class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-seven reviews over many years with rich detail and mostly consistent praise, plus a .

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 511
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHILD110 reviews
CHILD114 reviews
CHLD14 reviews
CHILD103 reviews
CHLD102 reviews
Show 4 more courses
305521 review
CHILD21851 review
CHLD111 review
CHLDCH641 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1