AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

John Nguyen

CHEM80 · CHEM40 · CHEM50 · CHEM10 · CHEM81 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
92.86%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you will read the book and show up; he is a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear LecturesCaring and FunnyHelpful Study GuidesFair GradingMust Read Textbook
  • , and real care for non-majors.
  • Grades are fair with study guides close to tests, but .
  • The single online CHEM50 review is a sharp outlier calling the class self-taught and poorly aligned.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

and study guides help, but an A and practice.

As; the lone online review is harder and unsatisfied.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Chemistry stays real, sometimes hard without background, but lectures and guides make it manageable.

Mostly in-person moderate difficulty; online CHEM50 felt harder and less supported.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and lab presence, with limited absences allowed.

and lectures often require presence; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

and call him a .

; the single online review would not take him again.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students note , and grades that match earned effort.

Format shift

; online review .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, and reading add up, but and manageable.

Format shift

and reading; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

and strong student care dominate the in-person record.

Format shift

Excellent in person; online teaching quality is sharply criticized in one review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Tests, quizzes, study guides, and a .

Format shift

and lab focused; online also hinges on exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and supportive, with study guides and if you keep up and read.

Main concern

because lectures alone may not cover everything.

What students said

“ AND ! Hes a sweetheart and really cares about students.”
CHEM50
“I took this class with Professor John Nguyen and found his and understandable.”
CHEM40
“A great knowledgeable professor that is very realistic in not expecting all of his students to be chem majors.”
CHEM80

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online CHEM50 review is negative: weak teaching, exam surprises, and a .

Main concern

in homework.

What students said

“This class is a self-taught class. You do excel for .”
CHEM50

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams often track study guides and practice work, with some tricky items and occasional ACS finals.

Study GuidesMultiple ChoiceACS Final SometimesTricky Questions

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes are often multiple choice with study guides very close to the real questions.

Study GuidesMC TestsACS Final OptionPractice Quizzes
“3 tests. 3 study guides before it, which were similar to tests, might even use same questions sometimes.”
CHEM80
“The tests or mini-exams.”
CHEM80
“Some questions in so you should read the book.”
CHEM40

Online

Online exams were criticized for including material not in .

Exam SurprisesSelf-Taught Prep
“The or was not taught.”
CHEM50

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ AND ! Hes a sweetheart and really cares about students. I HATE chemistry but taking him really opened my mind. !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting in-person teaching strengths and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“found his and understandable. He was very knowledgeable and humorous.”

👍

92/100

“ AND ! Hes a sweetheart and really cares about students.”

📘 Effort For The A

62/100

“Lectures alone won't be enough, so getting an A.”

🧪 Fair But

58/100

“3 study guides before it, which were similar to tests, might even use same questions sometimes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and understandable
  • He is authentic and interested in how you understand the material

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • an A
  • he was very lenient in grading and gave a lot of extracredits
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Hes a sweetheart and really cares about students
  • always approachable and helpful
  • All around good guy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews spanning many years with detailed consistent praise for in-person teaching quality.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM406 reviews
CHEM803 reviews
CHEM813 reviews
CHEM102 reviews
CHEM502 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values