AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jose Menjivar

MATH71 · MTH110 · MATH110 · MATH150 · MATH140 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless , and can survive a test-dominated grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyTough graderUnclear expectationsLecture heavyLittle support
  • Class grade is driven by hard tests with
  • Many students say teaching is weak, disorganized, or
  • Low recommendation rate; succeed only if and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

or unpredictable, and few report easy As without heavy self-study.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Fast lecture pace, multi-section coverage per class, and students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Repeated skip-class-you-wont-pass tags and warnings that missing even one section is costly.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most reviews urge finding another professor , and disorganization.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tough grader tags dominate; grades hinge on exams with .

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of homework plus heavy lectures, though .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Common complaints of bad teaching, unanswered questions, no grade posts, and inconsistent test content.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Students say while homework and in-class work are a tiny percent.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math students , and frustrating organization, with a minority who pass by showing up and grinding homework.

Main concern

Exams dominate the grade while lectures and .

What students said

“Do yourself a favor and find another professor.”
MATH140
“He knows the material well, but is really bad at teaching”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and are frequently described as , and poorly prepared for.

Test heavyHard multiple choiceFormula sheet sometimesTest corrections sometimesNo study guide often

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some allow formula sheets or corrections, but many report no study guide and harder-than-lecture problems.

Test heavyHard multiple choiceFormula sheet sometimesTest correctionsInconsistent test content
“If you don't do well on the . .”
MATH150
“Doesn't prepare you for the .”
MATH140

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He knows the material well, but is really bad at teaching”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 , and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝

28/100

“If you don't do well on the . .”

🚫 Low Recommendation

25/100

“Do yourself a favor and find another professor.”

👨‍🏫 Weak Instruction

30/100

“If you have a question expect another student to answer for it for you or if not hell just proceed with the lecture without answering your questions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You can easily fall asleep in his class and not pay attention
  • He only does one example each class for 2-3 sections
  • Menjivar was honestly so

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • . the multiple choice.
  • Most of the class is failing/dropped!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support

  • If so ever.
  • He does not post any grades at all FYI
  • I have asked him so many times when his office hours are, and he will tell me a certain time, and never show up!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve detailed in-person reviews from 2017-2022 with and weak instruction.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH1107 reviews
MATH1402 reviews
MATH1501 review
MATH711 review
MTH1101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3