AI Rate Professor

Political Science

James Jone

POLSC101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can self-teach from long videos and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTest heavyTough graderDoes not teachLecture videos onlyPolarized reviews
  • Recent POLSC101 review says the professor does not teach and dumps long lecture videos.
  • Exams are described as extremely heavy versus easy quizzes, with a very low class average.
  • An old 2010 five-star rave conflicts hard with the recent one-star experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and a class average near failing, so an A looks very costly.

All evidence is In person; no Online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Difficulty is rated 5 in the detailed recent review, with .

In person only; the old review claims low difficulty but lacks detail.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Neither review clearly states a .

In person reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Take-again data is 0 percent and the detailed recent review strongly warns students away.

Negative recommendation comes from the recent In person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tags include tough grader and average.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

heavy study load.

Format shift

Workload detail comes from the recent In person review.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Recent student says the professor did not teach and only sent lectures and videos.

Format shift

A brief 2010 rave conflicts with the detailed 2022 critique.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Quizzes are easy but and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person POLSC101 looks risky: one student reports no real teaching and crushing exams, while a decade-old review only says awesome.

Main concern

and lack of live teaching in the recent review.

What students said

“she did not teach and sent straight lectures and videos.”
POLSC101
“when it comes to the .”
POLSC101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as extremely heavy, with .

Test heavyMultiple choice plus essaysVideo-based essay prompts

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Recent review describes 20 multiple-choice .

20 multiple choice4 essay questionsHour-long videos
“she has 20 multiple choice that are 2.5 points then 4 essay questions that are all related to videos that are a hour long at minimum, which are worth 25 each.”
POLSC101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she did not teach and sent straight lectures and videos.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 In person reviews, weighting the detailed recent critique over a vague old rave. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Failure

28/100

“she did not teach and sent straight lectures and videos.”

📝 Brutal Exams

30/100

“when it comes to the .”

⚠️ Polarized History

18/100

“awesome teacher!!!!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she did not teach and sent straight lectures and videos
  • Lecture heavy
  • awesome teacher!!!!!!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • class avr is 80/175
  • extremly heavy

Theme 3

🧪 About Assessments

  • Her quizes are easy
  • 20 multiple choice
  • 4 essay questions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two In person reviews spanning 2010 to 2022 with sharp disagreement and thin older detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

POLSC1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1