AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Catalina Howland

N1A · N20001 · NURS1A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

if you have a choice; expect harsh expectations, weak teaching support, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProAvoid clinicalReads slidesPoor communicationTest heavyHarsh expectations
  • All three reviews rate quality 1 and .
  • Students and do not prepare them for exams.
  • Especially avoid for clinical or beginning nursing students needing support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Reported B+ grades with harsh expectations and a ; not an easy A path.

Online final weight hurt grades; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

High difficulty ratings and comments about too much expected of .

Both formats are hard; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

All reviews mark attendance mandatory with no flexibility signals.

Mandatory across online and in-person samples.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and and support failures.

and in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Unnecessarily harsh clinical standards and ; not described as fair or gentle.

Format shift

and in-person clinical harshness both pull scores down.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and high clinical expectations leave little light work.

Format shift

Reading and tests dominate online; clinical intensity is in-person.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students say she lacks teaching skills, reads slides, and will not help beginners.

Format shift

Awful across both formats in a tiny sample.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Tags and comments emphasize tests and a assignments.

Format shift

; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person clinical and lecture reviews call her impersonal, harsh, and unwilling to help beginners.

Main concern

Harsh clinical expectations with weak communication for novices.

What students said

“If . Not personable at all, lack of communication, unnecessarily harsh”
N20001
“Huge lack of communication skills, lack of attention, and nearly unwilling to help students.”
NURS1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online Zoom section criticized for useless lectures, sparse slides, and a .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Horrible. Her lectures do not help with her exams. .”
N1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams drive the grade and are poorly aligned with lectures; .

Test heavyHigh-weight finalLectures mismatch exams

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and harsh clinical standards without detailing open or closed book.

Test heavyHarsh clinical expectations
“ ”
NURS1A

Online

Online student reports lectures useless for exams and a final worth 48 percent that dropped an A to a B.

High-weight finalLecture-exam mismatch
“I had an A before the final, but bc the final was 48% I dropped down to a B”
N1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If . Not personable at all, lack of communication, unnecessarily harsh and expects too much from Students with no in field experience.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (1 online, 2 in and . Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Quality

12/100

“Never had a professor who lacked so many teaching skills.”

📉

34/100

“Her lectures do not help with her exams.”

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“0/10 would not take again.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You're just .
  • bare minimum attitude in this program

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • unnecessarily harsh and expects too much from Students with no in field experience
  • the final was 48% I dropped down to a B
  • Test heavy

Theme 3

🗣️ About Communication

  • lack of communication
  • nearly unwilling to help students
  • Not personable at all

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 uniformly negative reviews give a but limited breadth and time diversity.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

N1A1 review
N200011 review
NURS1A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values