AI Rate Professor

Real Estate

Monte Cicino

RE160 · BUSR55 · ECON101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Results vary by course; BUSR55 feedback is strong, but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardReads From BookMandatory TextbookPolarizingEasy Tests (Some Classes)Lecture Heavy
  • BUSR55 students praise engagement and easy tests; others say he only reads the book.
  • Several comments criticize forcing purchase of a book he helped write.
  • Outcomes range from easy pass to tough grader with heavy papers depending on course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some courses feel easy to pass with chapter-based tests; and many papers.

In-person BUSR55 looks easier; online RE160 and one ECON101 review are less positive on reward.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty ranges from easy engaging lectures to hard paper-heavy sections with book-only teaching.

Online review rates low difficulty but poor teaching; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

.

Both online and as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; praise clusters in BUSR55 while RE160 and ECON101 urge switching.

In-person BUSR55 recommends him; online RE160 and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and hard not to pass; .

Format shift

Fair grading appears in in-person BUSR55; tougher tone in ECON101.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

BUSR55 is graded on few items; ECON101 reports lots of homework and many papers.

Format shift

Workload is lighter in BUSR55 in-person and heavier in ECON101.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Split between engaging, supportive lectures and .

Format shift

Online RE160 is strongly negative; in-person BUSR55 is strongly positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

58/100

Common pattern is tests on chapter questions plus a few papers or finals.

Format shift

In-person BUSR55 emphasizes two papers and finals; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews split between engaging BUSR55 with easy tests and a harsh ECON101 critique of book-reading lectures.

Main concern

Course quality swings from easy and and heavy papers.

What students said

“ ! You are graded on only 2 papers and finals”
BUSR55
“He just stands in front of class and opens his mouth. Reads off the book”
ECON101
“ and based on the chapter questions. Its very hard to NOT pass!”
BUSR55

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online RE160 review is strongly negative: , and weak teaching.

Main concern

Forced textbook and .

What students said

“He had a hand in writing the book. So he mandate that you buy the book. Reads off the books. No teaching ability”
RE160

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Where described, tests are easy and based on chapter questions, paired with limited papers.

Chapter-Based TestsFew Graded ItemsPapers and Final

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person BUSR55 students report and a final.

Easy Chapter TestsTwo Papers and Final
“ ! You are graded on only 2 papers and finals”
BUSR55
“ and based on the chapter questions”
BUSR55

Online

The online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He just stands in front of class and opens his mouth. Reads off the book. He wants you to buy his latest book since he had a hand in publishing it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 polarized reviews across BUSR55, RE160, and ECON101. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Professor Cicino actively engages students in lectures and creates a ”

📚 Textbook Push

35/100

“He had a hand in writing the book. So he mandate that you buy the book”

👍 Split Recommendations

50/100

“You are better off taking a different class”

📝

70/100

“ and based on the chapter questions. Its very hard to NOT pass!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the professor really tries to engage with the class
  • Reads off the books. No teaching ability
  • actively engages students in lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Real easy class
  • Lots of homework, So many papers

Theme 3

💰 About Textbook & Cost

  • mandate that you buy the book
  • He wants you to buy his latest book since he had a hand in publishing it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only four polarized reviews across different .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

BUSR552 reviews
ECON1011 review
RE1601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values