AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Abbas Qanatqazi

MATH110 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

calling him bad at explaining.

Best fit · Self Taught ProBad at explainingLow qualityNot recommended
  • Only one review exists and it rates quality 1/5.
  • The sole comment is Bad at explaining with .
  • Insufficient detail on grades, exams, or workload beyond moderate difficulty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

No grade data or easy-A claims; only a low quality score and moderate difficulty suggest an A is not easy.

Evidence is entirely from one in-person MATH110 review.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty rated 3/5 with no comments describing content as easy or brain-burning.

Single in-person review only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

and the only comment is negative.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

; default mid score with no leniency evidence.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload not discussed in the single review.

Format shift

No .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Quality 1/5 with the only comment: bad at explaining.

Format shift

All evidence is the single in-person MATH110 review.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

Assessment method not mentioned.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person MATH110 review: quality 1, difficulty 3, would .

Main concern

.

What students said

“Bad at explaining”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Bad at explaining”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the sole teaching complaint. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Bad at explaining”

🚫 Recommendation

10/100

“Bad at explaining”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Bad at explaining

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

15/100

Evidence confidence

One vague 2021 review with almost no detail; reliability is very low.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values