AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Linda Chan

AA · ASTR115 · STAT110 · ASTR5 · AST5 · MATH51B · ASTRO5 · MATH51 · ASTR5L · MATH110 · MATH150 · ASTRO1 · MATH130 · MATH50 · 57 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
15.38%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

and stats unless you are a strong self-learner and a fast, unsympathetic pace.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast and unclear lecturesLots of homeworkTough graderAttitude complaintsExpensive required textbook
  • Recent math and stats reviews , and harsh grading.
  • Workload is high with and .
  • Older astronomy and lower-level math reviews are more mixed to positive, but current consensus is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Tough grading, heavy homework, and , even when a curve exists.

and drops; in person echoes hard work with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and content that feels harder than peer sections.

Online and and difficult; older astronomy is mixed.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

16/100

and skip-and-fail tags.

; online also often marks attendance yes.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Would-take-again is about 15 percent and modern math comments repeatedly say run or .

; in person has a few older positives but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Tough grader tags dominate recent reviews despite occasional curves or .

Format shift

Online and .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of , and weekend-consuming assignments are common.

Format shift

; in person also flags expensive required codes.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Many students say , and learning happens mainly from homework.

Format shift

Online is uniformly poor; in person is poor for math with some older astronomy praise.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests, quizzes, and in better sections.

Format shift

In person discusses exams and ticket-out work most; online focuses on projects and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and unhelpful, while some older astronomy and MATH50 notes are kinder.

Main concern

Fast lectures, strict rules, expensive new book codes, and little classroom support for confused students.

What students said

“AVOID!!! . Expects you to know what she's teaching you.”
MATH110
“She is an absolutely awful teacher and isn't thorough at all.”
MATH150
“This professor has no sympathy whatsoever.”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Both online stats reviews report , and a strong run-away warning.

Main concern

High drop rate, unclear instructions, and .

What students said

“30 students registered for this class, 20 dropped within the week. Only 5 students still attend her class at the end of this class, 25 dropped.”
MATH110
“I got a professor who somehow and had an attitude whenever someone asked a question.”
MATH110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often described as hard, test-heavy, and sometimes mismatched to lecture examples; no student-friendly open-book policy is clearly shown.

Test heavyStudy guides sometimes match testsHard midterms and finalsFormat changes mid-term

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and may not match examples; some better reviews say tests mirror study guides.

Test heavyStudy guides sometimes helpfulHard midterms and finals
“ and you will pass.”
MATH150
“She changed our exam format halfway through the class, making it very difficult to perform the same as before.”
MATH110
“ . No study guides.”
MATH110

Online

Online comments do not detail proctoring tools, but and high failure risk.

Tough graderGroup projects
“She has a lot of homework and she is a . So AS FAST AS YOU CAN.”
MATH110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“So AS FAST AS YOU CAN.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting avoid signals, heavy workload, strict climate, and older course-specific positives. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Warning

16/100

“ .”

⚡ Teaching Pace

28/100

“Way too fast for students to truly learn concepts.”

📚 Workload Load

22/100

“the .”

🧊 Classroom Climate

20/100

“She is rude to her students and will try to make fun of you if you are willing to teach the students that don't understand”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is an absolutely awful teacher and isn't thorough at all.
  • Not a good teacher. She requires a . Smart lady but not ment to teach.
  • Prepared lectures help understand the concepts

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and you will pass.
  • I worked way too hard in this class.
  • The only reason why everyone gets a decent grade in her class is because .

Theme 3

💸 About Costs & Rules

  • Makes you purchase a $99 textbook to take the class, not just rent but BUY a brand new one
  • Refuses as well
  • We cannot drink water or use the restroom.

Theme 4

❤️ Occasional Positives

  • This professor rocks. and has a great personality.
  • Prof Chan is a great teacher.
  • This professor is amazing! I loved her class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

57

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years form a strong sample; recent math and stats comments are highly consistent on avoid signals despite some older course-specific positives.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 55
3 out of 55
2 out of 512
1 out of 520

Course coverage

MATH11014 reviews
ASTRO58 reviews
MATH505 reviews
MATH1504 reviews
MATH514 reviews
Show 10 more courses
ASTR53 reviews
MATH1302 reviews
MATH51B2 reviews
STAT1102 reviews
1101 review
AA1 review
AST51 review
ASTR1151 review
ASTR5L1 review
ASTRO11 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 5

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3