AI Rate Professor

Aviation

James Tram

AIRM70 · AIRM71 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

Avoid unless the aviation program forces you into his section and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoes not teachUnorganizedHard examsSelf-taught labsAccent barrier
  • Most students say , and leaves them to teach themselves.
  • Course content and incorrect test questions.
  • One older positive review exists, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

No reported grades and repeated claims of poor exams and little help make an A .

Online hybrid review is especially bleak; .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Average difficulty near 5 with comments about hard topics, algebra drag, and .

Both formats rate difficulty extremely high.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Hybrid lab hours and ; other reviews do not describe optional attendance.

; in-person attendance details are sparse.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

, and most comments wish the program hired someone else.

Single online review is a hard no; in-person is mostly negative with one older 5-star exception.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students describe wrong or and long .

Format shift

; most others imply harsh outcomes.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

, and students must self-teach from dense material.

Format shift

Online hybrid stresses self-teaching load; .

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Dominant theme is that he does , and is when help is needed.

Format shift

Online hybrid is scathing; ones.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and lab hours feeding the grade.

Format shift

Both formats center exams; online adds hybrid lab hours.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews mostly cite unorganization, delayed grades, poor algebra help, and .

Main concern

, and weak one-on-one help when stuck.

What students said

“He took 8 and hours,he left them in his car!”
AIRM70
“if you genuinely need help or don't understand something, don't bother Asking for help He's very short with you”
AIRM71

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as pure self-teaching with weak PowerPoints and almost no lab guidance.

Main concern

Expect to teach yourself lecture and lab and .

What students said

“Does not teach, just reads from poorly made powerpoints. For lecture, expect to teach yourself everything and still .”
AIRM70

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students say , and poorly supported by lectures.

Hard examsConfusing test questionsSelf-taught preparationSection exams

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

test questions, and weak algebra instruction before exams.

Delayed gradesConfusing test questionsSection exams
“ and confusing.”
AIRM70
“ and then collected when the .”
AIRM71

Online

Online hybrid review says you teach yourself from weak slides and still do poorly on exams; .

Self-taught examsPoor PowerPointsLab worksheets instead of instruction
“For lecture, expect to teach yourself everything and still .”
AIRM70

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Does not teach, just reads from poorly made powerpoints. For lecture, expect to teach yourself everything and still .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (1 online, 4 in person), highlighting self-teaching load and organization failures. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

24/100

“Does not teach, just reads from poorly made powerpoints.”

🗂️ Organization Issues

20/100

“He took 8 and hours,he left them in his car!”

🆘 Help Availability

18/100

“if you genuinely need help or don't understand something, don't bother Asking for help He's very short with you”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • Does not teach, just reads from poorly made powerpoints
  • teach all over the place with no idea where to start
  • he does not speak English well at all

Theme 2

🧪

  • expect next to no instruction/guidance
  • and confusing
  • still

Theme 3

⚖️ About Fairness Outlier

  • Tram is an excellent profesor
  • He is firm/fair in grading
  • he will help you out one-on-one

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews spanning 2012-2021 are mostly aligned on poor teaching and high difficulty, though one strong positive outlier and older dates lower certainty.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

AIRM703 reviews
AIRM712 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values