AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Francis S. Kowalski

CISB15 · CISB21 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if he is your only Excel or Office option and and messy structure.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMonotone LecturesDisorganizedLecture HeavyExcel Only OptionStay Away Vibes
  • Many students call lectures long, robotic, and sleep-inducing
  • Organization and
  • Content knowledge can be fine and a few call him an , but

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Assignments can be easy and some call him an , but disorganization and .

All evidence is in person; no online review set.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Microsoft Office or Excel content is not conceptually brutal if you can follow tutorials or self-teach.

All evidence is in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Several sections require attending lectures to submit classwork and keep up.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and multiple students say stay away despite a couple positive outliers.

All recommendation evidence is in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Some students call him an ; others still land B/C or drop because structure fails them.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and long lectures; not always overloaded but lecture-heavy.

Format shift

Workload notes are all in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Knows Office tools but delivery is robotic, lectures drag, and organization often fails students.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

, and textbook tutorials drive the .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person and hybrid-era comments paint long monotone lectures, uneven organization, and mixed grades with .

Main concern

Disorganization, boring delivery, and .

What students said

“Very mono tone and boring 3 hour lectures.”
CISB21
“ !”
CISB21
“STAY AWAY”
CISB15

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly classwork and homework; one student suspects proctors for exams but details are limited.

Classwork SubmissionsHomework HeavyPossible Proctored ExamsLecture-Tied Assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

assignment and classwork focused; one review thinks exams may use proctors, without software specifics.

ClassworkHomeworkPossible Proctors
“I think he uses proctors for exams too!”
CISB21
“The class is compiled with class work and hw”
CISB15

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I cannot believe this guy is a college professor. and forgets assignments. If he were only one teaching this course, I would transfer. STAY AWAY”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews (0 online), highlighting monotone delivery, disorganization, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“Very mono tone and boring 3 hour lectures.”

👎 Recommendation

28/100

“STAY AWAY”

🗂️ Organization Issues

30/100

“The class and its hard to find the files!!!!”

😴 Delivery Style

25/100

“Good luck staying awake in his class. Robotic tone type!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very mono tone and boring 3 hour lectures
  • his voice will put you to sleep
  • There isn't much teaching involved

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • !!!
  • He is an and
  • If you're self motivated you can survive!

Theme 3

🗂️ About Organization

  • Disorganized and unclear
  • forgets assignments
  • hard to find the files!!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews from 2012-2021 with repeated monotone and organization complaints, but mixed positivity keeps confidence at medium.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CISB156 reviews
CISB213 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2