AI Rate Professor

American Sign Language

Ann Adamiak

ASL1 · SIGN101 · SIGN227 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a serious interpreting path; come ready to work and show up.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCaring and inspirationalClear expectationsLots of homeworkSelf-motivated requiredAccessible outside class
  • but rewarding for motivated students
  • Easy A is realistic in ASL1 if

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

ASL1 can be an easy A with , but advanced interpreting courses demand real effort and improvement.

Online ASL1 mixed; easy A claims stronger for early ASL, not SIGN227 in person.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Beginner ASL is manageable while interpreting coursework is tough and requires self-motivation.

In-person SIGN227 drives difficulty up; online comments focus more on format than content hardness.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory and and you will not pass.

Mandatory is clearest in person; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and call her caring and excellent, with a minority frustrated by tough standards or weak online delivery.

In-person recommendation is stronger; one .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and some leniency in ASL1, but and high expectations in SIGN227.

Format shift

Leniency appears more in early ASL; SIGN227 in person is stricter.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Multiple mentions of lots of , and high participation expectations.

Format shift

Heavy load is clearest in in-person SIGN227; online notes more busywork and videos.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and strong mentorship, with some pandemic online complaints.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is strong; online quality is split.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Homework, participation, sign videos, readings, and improvement over time .

Format shift

and recorded practice more than classic exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person SIGN227 is demanding with high expectations, lots of work, and strong mentorship for lifelong learners.

Main concern

Strict professionalism and attendance standards plus heavy workload can overwhelm unprepared students.

What students said

“It's tough but .”
SIGN227
“She wants you to give 110% , be 15 minutes early to class, dress like a pro”
SIGN227
“One of the .”
SIGN227

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

while another praised organization and responsiveness during COVID shift.

Main concern

Limited live teaching can leave students feeling they are teaching themselves.

What students said

“it seems like we're teaching ourselves. I understand its online now but at least have zoom lectures.”
ASL1
“Ann is so organized and makes it work somehow. We are still learning and it's even fun.”
SIGN101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews rarely describe formal exams and , and demonstrated progress.

Homework-centeredParticipation videosImprovement expected

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessments emphasize participation, improvement, and substantial out-of-class work; .

Participation mattersLots of homeworkClear grading criteria
“We did a lot of work! There was no required book but we had tons of readings and films.”
SIGN227

Online

Online work centered on videos, Ted Talks, self-recordings, and peer comments .

YouTube and Ted TalksSelf-recorded videosPeer comments
“all we have done is watch youtube videos and ted talks. or record ourselves doing stuff and commenting on other students videos.”
ASL1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It's tough but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting teaching quality, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“One of the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“Whether you need a regular class or an .”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“We did a lot of work! There was no required book but we had tons of readings and films.”

⚖️

58/100

“Easy A if you do all the homework.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and answers questions
  • Ann is so organized and makes it work somehow
  • amazing person and cares for you and your success

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if you do all the homework
  • It's tough but
  • She wants you to give 110%

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • it seems like we're teaching ourselves
  • I don't pay to get taught by youtube
  • She provides everything you need and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed reviews span 2017-2020 with consistent themes but modest sample size and pandemic-era format noise.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SIGN2274 reviews
ASL12 reviews
SIGN1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1