AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Erica Tseng

ENGR1 · ENG42 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Fine for if you can tolerate delayed starts and ; evidence is too thin for a strong endorsement.

Best fit · Effort For RewardProject-basedClear gradingSometimes lateFew examsExtra credit
  • ENGR1 is project-heavy with almost no tests and high grades reported.
  • ENG42 is straightforward solids/materials with and .
  • Small sample and one complaint about chronic lateness and slow grade posting limit confidence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Both reviewers earned A or A+ with and little test pressure in ENGR1.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

and light; mechanics is moderate but not a brain-burner.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory and participation as important.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

One student would take again for ENG42; the ENGR1 reviewer would not, citing lateness despite an A+.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

and with high reported grades; few high-stakes exams in ENGR1.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

ENGR1 centers on three projects with barely any tests; ENG42 is not a free ride but manageable.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Described as a-ok to great and no-nonsense, tempered by chronic lateness in one class.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

ENGR1 emphasizes manufacturing, robot, and ; ENG42 is graded by few things.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person engineering courses mixing late-start lectures with .

Main concern

Shows up very late and posts grades slowly in ENGR1.

What students said

“Profe. Tseng is a-ok professor she shows up to class like 45 min late... . Takes forever to input grades.”
ENGR1
“Straight forward, no nonsense instructor. Not the hardest class but not a walk thru the park.”
ENG42

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans on projects and a small number of graded .

Barely any testsProject-based assessmentGraded by few things

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person ENGR1 has almost no tests and three major projects; ENG42 uses few graded items with .

Three projectsBarely any testClear grading criteria
“Intro to engineering class is fun three projects a manufacturing project, robot project, and .”
ENGR1
“Straight forward, no nonsense instructor. Not the hardest class but not a walk thru the park.”
ENG42

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Profe. Tseng is a-ok professor she shows up to class like 45 min late... . Takes forever to input grades.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews only; themes are tentative. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Course Structure

72/100

“Intro to engineering class is fun three projects a manufacturing project, robot project, and .”

👍

74/100

“Great class to learn Solids/ Mechanics of Materials / Materials. Straight forward, no nonsense instructor.”

⏱️ Reliability Concerns

40/100

“she shows up to class like 45 min late... Takes forever to input grades.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • a-ok professor
  • Straight forward, no nonsense instructor
  • Shes 50/50

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not the hardest class but not a walk thru the park
  • A+ / A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews from 2018 give limited, course-specific snapshots without a long time span or broad consensus.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG421 review
ENGR11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values