AI Rate Professor

Economics

Jason Gurtovoy

BUSC1A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already love economics and can teach yourself from the book.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesHeavy readingLots of homeworkPoor explanationAvoid
  • Single review rates quality 2/5 and .
  • Lectures skim notes without examples; board notes are sloppy.
  • and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Graded by few things with lots of homework and ; student who loves economics still struggled.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty rated 4/5 with self-taught chapters and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Review opens with and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Tagged graded by few things; limited graded items raise risk if those go poorly.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Skims notes without explaining or examples; board work is sloppy and unstructured.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Lots of homework and reading dominate; graded by few things.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person BUSC1A lecture is ; students must read and .

Main concern

Unclear lectures with no examples .

What students said

“ . Skims through notes during lecture WITHOUT explaining or giving examples.”
BUSC1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Skims through notes during lecture WITHOUT explaining or giving examples.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with strong negative detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Skims through notes during lecture WITHOUT explaining or giving examples & writes notes on board very sloppy.”

👎 Recommendation

10/100

“ .”

📚 Workload

22/100

“Hw every week. Have to read chapter on own time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Skims through notes during lecture WITHOUT explaining or giving examples
  • writes notes on board very sloppy and with no structure

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Workload

  • Hw every week
  • Have to read chapter on own time

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one detailed but single-sided 2018 review; sample too small for high confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BUSC1A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1