AI Rate Professor

Economics

Dezzie Prewitt

BUSC1A · BUSC1B · ECON101 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you learn well from lectures and notes, but expect uneven professionalism and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture HeavyOnline HomeworkTest HeavyMixed ReviewsGroup Project
  • Students split between caring, engaging lectures and .
  • Exams follow board notes and examples; .
  • , but coming to lecture still matters for exams and review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

, but and most reported grades cluster around B.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is standard intro econ difficulty, though winter sessions and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

, though some still say class helps exam prep.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

; praise for care and clarity competes with .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Some call him an while ; overall B-heavy outcomes look fair.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

40/100

Online homework is frequent and long for some, but .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Engaging real-world lectures and help after class clash with reports of poor teaching and unprofessional moments.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Tests and lecture notes drive grades, with and a group project or presentation.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

criticism of long online homework and inconsistent class management.

Main concern

, and tough experiences in accelerated formats.

What students said

“ on the board, so there are no surprises.”
BUSC1B
“HW is useless & takes hours to do.”
BUSC1A
“He helped our group with and we got perfect score”
BUSC1B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and board examples; some sections replace the .

Lecture-Based ExamsBoard ExamplesGroup Presentation OptionNo Quizzes Sometimes

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students say exams match board examples and notes; some classes use two tests plus a group presentation instead of a .

Board-Based TestsTwo ExamsGroup Presentation Final Option
“ on the board, so there are no surprises.”
BUSC1B
“He used a group presentation instead of a .”
BUSC1A
“No quizzes + 2 exams prior to Final.”
BUSC1B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to do well, study his notes, the examples in notes are similar to the test.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews, highlighting mixed teaching quality and . Credibility rating: High.

📊 Mixed Recommendation

55/100

“ .”

📝

40/100

“His HW is useless! Its all online and just busy work.”

❤️ Caring Side

70/100

“He stayed and talked to us all. He helped our group with and we got perfect score”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Taught us about economics in the real world.
  • He doesn't teach well, u kind of have to figure a lot of it out by urself.
  • Able to keep you engaged when you normally wouldn't be.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • he's not an .
  • Many felt like we could get A in class.

Theme 3

📚

  • study his notes, the examples in notes are similar to the test.
  • HW is useless & takes hours to do.
  • Homework is online, 2 tests and 1 group presentation.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Nine detailed in-person reviews across multiple terms show mixed but and exams.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

BUSC1A4 reviews
BUSC1B4 reviews
ECON1011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1