AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Ana Mayo

CHEM50 · CHEM40 · CHEM10 · CHEM1 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid for chem sequences unless , and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderSelf-Taught RequiredUnresponsive HelpTest HeavyPolarizing Chem
  • Many students say and the class becomes self-taught.
  • Help can be hard to get; some report ignored emails and brushed-off questions.
  • Workload and grading feel heavy for CHEM50, with mixed or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some mention and curves, but many call her a and lots of homework, so an A still costs real effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Average difficulty is moderate-high; students often say lectures assume prior knowledge and pace or .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and tags warn skip class and you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

33/100

Would-take-again is only about one-third, and multiple reviews call her the .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tough grader tags dominate CHEM50, with reports of low pass rates and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students report lots of , and comprehensive exams.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Knowledge is respected, but many say explanations are unclear, disorganized, or unhelpful when students ask.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Multiple-choice exams, comprehensive tests, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some call her sweet with , many say she , and help is unreliable.

Main concern

and students often feel forced to self-learn.

What students said

“This class is basically self learned. .”
CHEM50
“Clearly she knows chemistry really well, but the of the league.”
CHEM50
“I emailed her tons of times and never got a single response back, when I went for help she would brush me off.”
CHEM1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and said to mismatch lecture and homework.

Multiple Choice ExamsTheory-Heavy TestsNo Study Guide MentionedComprehensive Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and students report little study-guide support.

Multiple ChoiceTheory-FocusedComprehensive Exams
“In .... :D Cons: she likes to test more on theories in the exam while she does not focus on theories in lecture.”
CHEM50
“She doesn't word her question in an understandable form. She's does not provide a study guide nor formulas during the exam.”
CHEM50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far the worst professor I've ever had in general. She does not teach well and she gives out.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching clarity, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Clarity

40/100

“This class is basically self learned. .”

🚫 Recommendation

33/100

“ . Sac!”

⚖️

28/100

“6 out of 29 passed her exam, and she does nothing to help.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the of the league
  • she also assigns tons of

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Yes, many extra credits. if there are many people getting below 70%
  • you do have to work, but she makes it as easy as possible

Theme 3

💬 About Help & Support

  • I emailed her tons of times and never got a single response back
  • she is always there for questions you might have

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Ten in-person reviews span 2014-2017 with mixed detail; opinions are polarized but enough for a medium confidence read.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHEM103 reviews
CHEM503 reviews
CHEM402 reviews
218881 review
CHEM11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Rather not say 1