AI Rate Professor

Engineering

David Yost

ARIM65 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

, but verify workload and because only a one-word review exists.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAmazing lecturesWould take againHigh qualityChallenging course
  • Single review rates quality 5 with amazing lectures tag
  • Course difficulty is high (4) with almost no detail
  • , but evidence is extremely thin

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Difficulty is rated 4 and no grade or easy-A signals appear, so an A likely takes real work.

Evidence comes .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Difficulty rating of 4 with .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

and quality 5, but the written comment is too thin for MustTake.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

No grade or grading comments, so fairness is assumed neutral.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

High difficulty rating suggests more than light effort, but workload is not described.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Quality 5 and Amazing lectures tag support strong teaching despite a one-word comment.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

No assessment details were provided.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

high quality and higher difficulty.

Main concern

Comment is only Very good with .

What students said

“Very good”
ARIM65

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very good”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 sparse in-person review. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Very good”

👍 Recommendation Rate

80/100

“Yes”

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

30/100

“Course DIFFICULTY rating: 4”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • Very good

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 4
  • Professor QUALITY rating: 5

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

One 2017 review with only Very good and minimal metadata limits confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARIM651 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values