AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

E. Perez Romero

PHIL8 · PHILO5 · PHILO8 · PHILOSOPHY5 · PHIL12 · PHIL15 · PHIL5 · PHILOSOPHY · ETHICS · PHIL05 · ETHIC1 · PHIL12ETHICS · AAVEBPHI5 · 66 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you will show up, participate, and keep up with weekly journals; you will learn a lot and can earn a strong grade with steady effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardInspirational lecturesParticipation heavyWeekly journalsClear expectationsExtra credit friendly
  • Passionate, funny lectures make philosophy engaging and memorable.
  • Weekly papers and participation heavily drive the grade; .
  • absences.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic if you nail journals, participate, and use , but and participation can block a free A.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

and discussion, though abstract ideas and consistent writing keep it from being purely light.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and absences or ; skipping is repeatedly tied to failing outcomes.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students praise passionate lectures and and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

, but some call him a tough grader on journals and essay format.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Expect weekly journals or , and regular participation.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

87/100

Students , and life-applicable with strong discussion leadership.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Weekly journals, papers, and participation outweigh midterms and finals, which many call easy.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person philosophy classes center on lively discussion, , and generally approachable midterms and finals.

Main concern

Strict attendance penalties and is solid.

What students said

“It is extremely easy to pass this class. . Midterm and .”
PHIL5
“Participation is key. If you didn't participate in the class, the highest grade you can get is a B.”
PHIL12
“ as dirt! God bless this man!”
PHIL12ETHICS

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally described as straightforward or easy if you complete the readings and journals.

Easy midterm and finalStraightforward examsQuizzes from readingGlossary-style final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals are repeatedly called easy or dirt-easy when students keep up with readings.

Easy finalStraightforward midtermReading-based quizzes
“Midterm and .”
PHIL5
“ as dirt!”
PHIL12ETHICS
“there are and it is the back of the glossary...very easy.”
PHIL12ETHICS

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Incredible professor! Made this seemingly boring class actually interesting and had me remembering his lectures outside of class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching passion, journals, and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

87/100

“Prof ROMERO is amazing at what he lectures! makes everything interesting and easy to understand.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“Ive taken Professor Romero twice... He is honestly such an amazing professor.”

📝 Workload Reality

48/100

“SO MANY PAPERS”

🚪

18/100

“Absent? -10 pts. Late? -2pts.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Makes lectures fun and interesting
  • super passionate about Philosophy
  • His humor is a plus

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He really makes you work for the grade
  • possible to get an A with a C average on those
  • on

Theme 3

🗣️ About Participation

  • Participation matters a lot
  • asking him a simple question counts as participation
  • if you didn't participate... highest grade you can get is a B

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

66

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed in-person reviews spanning many years show consistent themes on lectures, participation, and journals.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 544
4 out of 513
3 out of 57
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PHIL520 reviews
PHIL127 reviews
PHIL154 reviews
PHIL053 reviews
PHIL12ETHICS3 reviews
Show 10 more courses
ETHIC12 reviews
PHILO52 reviews
PHILOSOPHY52 reviews
204021 review
414461 review
AAVEBPHI51 review
ETHICS1 review
PHIL81 review
PHILO81 review
PHILOSOPHY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 6

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1