AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Rosa Preciado

PSYC17 · EDU · EDUCATION10 · EDU10 · PSYCH1A · PSYCH50 · EDUCATION · PSYCHKJHL · EDU16 · EDUC16 · PYSC25 · PSYC25 · PSYCH25 · ED10 · EDUC10 · PSYCH17 · INTROTOEDU · 64 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take her if and progressive viewpoints and will read the book carefully; skip if and low politics.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizingDiscussion HeavyTextbook ExamsPolitical LecturesCaring but Unorganized
  • Large sample is split between devoted fans and students who found lectures off-topic and tests book-only.
  • rather than class discussion.
  • Supportive and personable for many, but politics-heavy tangents and organization complaints are common.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many say effort plus reading and study guides can yield a B or A, but , and As.

Nearly ; the one online review reports an A without workload detail.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Average difficulty is and tests hard if .

; online sample is too thin to compare.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

; some say class is optional because tests are book-based, others imply presence for discussions.

and almost entirely in-person.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and many call her amazing, but a sizable minority strongly warn others away.

Polarization ; online is one glowing review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and ; others report unfair papers or grade portal surprises.

Format shift

Mixed in-person evidence; .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Often few exams and projects, but , and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Many praise clarity, care, and inspiration; many others cite tangents, politics, and weak organization.

Format shift

In-person is polarized; single online review is strongly positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Multiple-choice or ; lectures often do not match tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and circle discussions to unorganized, politics-heavy lectures with textbook-only tests and grade disputes.

Main concern

Lecture tangents and exams not matching class discussion.

What students said

“ . and goes over everything.”
EDU16
“The material discussed in class had nothing to do with the exam questions. The .”
EDU10
“Almost all of what she says in class is her opinion and she goes on LONG tangents on daily basis”
PSYCH25

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Single online review is strongly positive, calling her knowledgeable, relatable, and enjoyable throughout.

Main concern

; little detail on online structure.

What students said

“Total bad ass, I loved every minute spent in this class. She not only was knowledgeable in the course subject but as Mexican-American was very relatable”
PSYCH1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

a note card or study guide, plus writing-heavy papers.

Textbook-Based ExamsMultiple ChoiceStudy Guide3x5 Note CardLong Papers

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

textbook or handouts, not lecture, with occasional 3x5 cards and long papers.

Textbook-Based ExamsMultiple Choice3x5 Note CardStudy Guide
“ creates, you get to make a 3x5 card so they're pretty simple.”
EDU16
“ though, (the lectures just add to the reading material) so read!”
PSYC25
“The .”
EDU10

Online

The single online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's one of the . Sac. She's genuine, honest, and likeable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (1 online, 49 , and care. Credibility rating: High.

💬 Polarizing Classroom Voice

70/100

“She goes on LONG tangents on daily basis (which I wouldn't mind so much if everyone wasn't failing the )”

📖

52/100

“The .”

❤️

78/100

“She is like a second mom to me...really sweet and always there.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She sits the class in a circle and
  • goes on LONG tangents on daily basis
  • Talks about controversial topics, but only to make us aware

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not an easy A because she wants you to LEARN
  • you get to make a 3x5 card so they're pretty simple

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • one of the most amazing professors i have ever known
  • and a very well educated and successful woman

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

64

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years with rich conflicting detail yield high confidence about the polarizing pattern despite sparse grade data.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 540
4 out of 56
3 out of 58
2 out of 58
1 out of 52

Course coverage

EDU1012 reviews
PSYCH2510 reviews
EDUC105 reviews
EDU163 reviews
EDUC163 reviews
Show 12 more courses
PSYCH173 reviews
EDUCATION2 reviews
EDUCATION102 reviews
PSYC252 reviews
ED101 review
EDU1 review
INTROTOEDU1 review
PSYC171 review
PSYCH1A1 review
PSYCH501 review
PSYCHKJHL1 review
PYSC251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values