AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Edward Romero

PHIL12 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

if you want an inspiring philosophy mentor and are ready to participate every day.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInspirationalParticipation RequiredTough But RewardingWise Mentor
  • Single glowing review calls him the . Sac class and credits his wisdom.
  • Course is tough and .
  • Student earned an A- and would take him again at 1000/10.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Student earned an A- but stresses the class is pretty tough and participation is a must.

Single in-person review only; no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Difficulty rated 5/5 with heavy involvement expectations.

Single in-person review only; no online evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

Single in-person review only; no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Student rates him 1000/10 and calls him an amazing, hook-you-on-day-one professor.

Single in-person review only; no online evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

A- reported with tough standards; no claims of free grades or .

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Main demand is constant involvement and .

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Described as the wisest professor and .

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews emphasize .

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person PHIL12 felt inspirational and demanding, with mandatory participation and high engagement.

Main concern

and you will struggle to pass.

What students said

“This class was probably the . Sac and I give all the credit to Professor Romero.”
PHIL12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall, he's an amazing professor. 1000/10 !”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting inspiration and participation demands. Credibility rating: Low.

⭐ Inspirational Mentor

92/100

“He's the wisest man I know and I assure you the very first day you'll be hooked.”

🗣️ Participation Or Fail

12/100

“In this class you have to be VERY involved and participation is a MUST!!”

👍

96/100

“This class was probably the . Sac”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's the wisest man I know
  • the very first day you'll be hooked
  • amazing professor. 1000/10 !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • he's pretty tough too
  • participation is a MUST!!
  • A-

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one detailed 2017 review exists, so scores rest on a .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values