AI Rate Professor

English

Jane Heyman

COS126 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; one old review paints a harsh, biased classroom with no upside.

Best fit · Self Taught ProStatus BiasWorst TeacherMandatory AttendanceHigh DifficultyNot Recommended
  • Single review calls her the
  • Student says she treated people differently by school status
  • Mandatory attendance, no take-again, quality 1 difficulty 5

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

Difficulty rated 5 and the ; no grade relief is mentioned.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Student rated course difficulty at the maximum with no positive content notes.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and called her the .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

No grade given, but overall quality 1 and status-based .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

40/100

Workload not described; only high difficulty and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Student called her the status.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One in-person review describes unfair treatment based on student status and an overall terrible experience.

Main concern

Perceived favoritism and very poor teaching quality with .

What students said

“ their status at school”
COS126

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ their status at school”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting fairness and teaching complaints. Credibility rating: Low.

💥 Teaching Quality

8/100

“ their status at school”

👎 Recommendation

5/100

“No”

⚠️ Fairness Concern

15/100

“treated people differently based in their status at school”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching & Fairness

  • their status at school
  • No

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty

  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 5
  • Yes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2016 review with little detail beyond a harsh overall judgment.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COS1261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values