AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

John Lentz

PHIL5 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take him if you will engage with and want a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesChill professorEssay-heavyInteresting philosophyHigh paper expectations
  • Students find lectures clear and often interesting if they like philosophy
  • Workload is light and final
  • An A is realistic with

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Students report As with strong essay work, but also say it is not an easy A and .

All evidence is from in-person PHIL5 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, yet essays require deep thinking and several rate difficulty as 4.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

, so flexibility is inconsistent across reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and real learning if you are .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades seem fair when you put real effort into essays; expectations on papers are high.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Workload

Light

72/100

and final essays.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students , and helpful even when lectures feel long.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Assessment centers on and final.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person PHIL5 students praise organized, clear, chill lectures with light weekly writing and .

Main concern

Essay midterms and and real effort for an A.

What students said

“Mr. and his lectures are very interesting if philosophy is something that you are interested in.”
PHIL5
“BE PREPARED TO DIG DEEP INTO YOUR BRAIN and and you will receive an A.”
PHIL5
“ but prepare to use your brain!”
PHIL5

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Midterm and thinking and writing effort.

Essay MidtermEssay FinalDeep Thinking Required

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals are multi-essay exams with high expectations on papers.

Essay MidtermEssay FinalHigh Paper Expectations
“midterm and . BE PREPARED TO DIG DEEP INTO YOUR BRAIN”
PHIL5
“Midterms and Final were consisted of 4 essay questions.”
PHIL5

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but prepare to use your brain!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting lecture quality and essay demands. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Mr. and his lectures are very interesting if philosophy is something that you are interested in.”

📝

55/100

“BE PREPARED TO DIG DEEP INTO YOUR BRAIN and and you will receive an A.”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“ but prepare to use your brain!”

🪶 Light Weekly Work

72/100

“There's barely any HW but midterm and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and his lectures are very interesting
  • really chill and each class is spent lecturing
  • Totally understandable and chill professor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • not an easy A
  • high expectations for
  • It was my hardest class in the semester, but I felt like I learned a lot

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • All he assigns are and final
  • each week
  • Homework was easy, just 100-200 words on the subject

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four consistent in-person PHIL5 reviews from 2015-2016 with solid detail but a small sample and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL54 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values