AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Donice Robles

CHLD10 · CHILD10 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid unless you are self-motivated and ready for and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPicky GraderDoes Not TeachHeavy WorkloadEndless RedosSelf-Taught Course
  • Most students call her a horrible instructor who rambles off-topic and leaves you to teach yourself.
  • and credit refusals.
  • and workload is heavy for little classroom teaching value.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Passing requires heavy effort and perfect formatting; picky redos and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content itself is less the , and self-study demands that make the course hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Every detailed .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Three of four reviews strongly and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report , and endless forced redos.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews repeatedly cite lots of work, redos, and heavy self-study outside class.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Most call her a horrible instructor who rambles off-topic and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments center on assignments, redos, and format .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, heavy work, and picky redo loops that frustrate most students.

Main concern

She does not teach key content clearly yet grades strictly on format and details she never explained.

What students said

“She grades you on things she did not ask for, is super picky, refuses to give you credit when you turn an assignment in.”
CHLD10
“LOTS OF WORK & everything was self taught.”
CHLD10
“shedoes not teach you key terms so if because she never teaches anything in class.”
21565

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

teach in class; proctoring details are not described.

Study-heavy examsContent not taught in class

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

because key terms are not taught in class.

Study-heavy examsContent not taught in class
“shedoes not teach you key terms so if because she never teaches anything in class.”
21565

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is horrible!! She grades you on things she did not ask for, is super picky, refuses to give you credit when you turn an assignment in.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, , and heavy workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Decent lady but horrible instructor. She rambles on about nonsense (like why you should vote) while going over nothing pertaining to class content.”

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“ . . You've been warned.”

📝

18/100

“She'll return it and make you redo it- OVER AND OVER.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • everything was self taught
  • She rambles on about nonsense
  • she never teaches anything in class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is super picky
  • make you redo it- OVER AND OVER
  • if you work hard you will pass

Theme 3

⚠️

  • LOTS OF WORK
  • there is only 10 student left

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Four detailed in-person reviews from 2015-2016 are directionally consistent but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHLD102 reviews
215651 review
CHILD101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1