AI Rate Professor

Engineering

M. Jue

ENGR24 · ENG24CAD · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid if you have another option; if you can ignore rude behavior and just grind the assignments.

Best fit · Self Taught ProBelittles studentsEasy if you workMood-dependentStraightforward examsRude delivery
  • Passable CAD/engineering class if you complete the work
  • belittling, yelling, and mood swings
  • , but learning depth and classroom climate are weak

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

You can pass by doing the work and , but an A still depends on staying on his good side.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Students describe the class as simple with repeated concepts and little depth, though CAD can feel tedious.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

At ; flexibility is not supported by comments.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Even students who pass often dislike him for belittling, yelling, and punishing anyone who upsets him.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Work and straightforward exams can get you through, but if he dislikes you.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

68/100

Comments emphasize simple content, repeated concepts, and passing if you do the work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

and keep exams simple, but rude, belittling behavior dominates the experience.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention classwork and straightforward exams without a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but a harsh, belittling classroom style.

Main concern

Rude treatment and mood-based difficulty can make the class miserable even when content is simple.

What students said

“This guy is not a nice person. He belittles his students a looooot! If .”
ENG24CAD
“Class very simple and exams straighforward.”
ENGR24
“If you piss him off, might as . He will make it hard on you.”
ENG24CAD

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as straightforward and aligned with repeatedly covered concepts.

Straightforward examsRepeated concepts

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

repeated many times in class.

Straightforward examsRepeated concepts
“Class very simple and exams straighforward. He repeated the concepts many times so not much was covered in class.”
ENGR24

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This guy is not a nice person. He belittles his students a looooot! If .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting climate, ease, and recommendation themes. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Classroom Climate

25/100

“He would scream and yell from right behind me and hurt my ears.”

📗 Easy Content

65/100

“Class very simple and exams straighforward.”

👎 Recommendation

32/100

“If .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He belittles his students a looooot
  • He repeated the concepts many times
  • Ok teacher, wasn't very excited about the class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You'll pass if you do your work
  • Class very simple and exams straighforward
  • If you piss him off, might as

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • not a nice person
  • Little goofy and easy going
  • pretty nice and understanding guy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three sparse in-person reviews across 2005-2016 limit reliability despite consistent personality concerns.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG24CAD2 reviews
ENGR241 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values