AI Rate Professor

Astronomy & Earth Sciences

Amanda Hendrix

ASTR7 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid if you can; two reviews describe a and poorly taught.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnclear LecturesPowerPoint ReaderBoring ClassRandom HomeworkAvoid If Possible
  • , and reading from slides.
  • Heavy math and and poor grades.
  • Only bright spot is a NASA field trip that one student loved and another said would earn an F.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Students report D grades, heavy math, and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Lots of math and unclear lectures make the material and apply.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and notes many cancelled class days.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Both students say and describe a horrible boring experience.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Reported D grade and fear of F from field trip suggest unforgiving outcomes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Lectures described as unplanned, boring, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Homework and field trip mentioned but ; overall assessment still feels punitive.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person ASTR7 with top-of-head lectures, PowerPoints, missed Mondays, and mixed field-trip reports.

Main concern

, and absences make an already hard class feel unmanageable.

What students said

“She is obviously just lecturing off the top of her head and . Just a horrible and boring class.”
ASTR7
“ . and just reads off of .”
ASTR7

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; overall course assessment feels hard and poorly supported.

Heavy mathIn-person courseHomework heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; students stress math-heavy work and .

Heavy mathConfusing homework
“if you arent good in random homework that doesnt make much sense.”
ASTR7

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not sure if she is still teaching but . She is obviously just lecturing off the top of her head and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews with consistent negative tone. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Just a horrible and boring class.”

📉 Recommendation

12/100

“HATE THIS PROFESSOR! .”

📚 Workload Pain

30/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • just reads off of .
  • lecturing off the top of her head and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you arent good in
  • if you go on her field trip you will get an F

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 older in-person reviews, both strongly negative, so confidence in breadth is low even though tone is consistent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ASTR72 reviews

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1