AI Rate Professor

Agriculture

Tom Visosky

AGAG91 · AGOR62 · IRRIGATION · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you need the agriculture course and can teach yourself; expect weak structure and shortened class time.

Best fit · Self Taught ProKnows the FieldPoor StructureShort LecturesMisses ClassMust Attend for Work
  • Students credit his expertise in water hydraulics and irrigation but question classroom delivery.
  • short lectures for long class blocks, weak structure, missed classes, and early dismissal.
  • Some earlier reviews liked him, found material easy, and said he answers emails well.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some call the work easy if you attend and complete it, but one student still found the course hard despite an A- grade.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty ratings swing from very easy to very hard; content expertise is there but delivery is shallow.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and another says you must attend class to get work.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Older reviews are positive while more recent ones call him a poor professor and waste of money.

Split .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Reported grades include A- and B; students who do the work can pass, with .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Light

70/100

Several comments imply light or skimming coverage; book often unused with handouts instead.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Field knowledge is respected, but students criticize short lectures, missed classes, and weak people skills.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments stress doing class work and handouts more than formal exams.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some loved him and found work easy, while later reviews call him a waste of money who lectures briefly and lacks structure.

Main concern

Short lecture time for long scheduled blocks and weak course structure.

What students said

“You pay for a 5 hour class and he only lectures for 1.5 hrs. A waste of money”
IRRIGATION
“He is a nice guy and an expert in water hydrolics. Skims over topics without a strutured class syllabus.”
AGOR62
“Loved the teacher. You must attend class to get work.”
AGAG91

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; success depends on attending to receive and complete work.

HandoutsMust Attend for Work

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize handouts and attending class to .

HandoutsMust Attend for Work
“You must attend class to get work. Book not used; he gives handouts.”
AGAG91
“It was easy to understand and he is .”
AGAG91

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You pay for a 5 hour class and he only lectures for 1.5 hrs. A waste of money, especially when you live far.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting expertise versus weak structure and short lectures. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Class Structure

30/100

“Course has no solid structure. He does not use moodlerooms like other professors”

🧠 Subject Expertise

70/100

“He is a nice guy and an expert in water hydrolics.”

⏱️ Shortchanged Time

25/100

“You pay for a 5 hour class and he only lectures for 1.5 hrs.”

❤️ Supportive Moments

65/100

“Loved the teacher. You must attend class to get work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great Teacher
  • Skims over topics without a strutured class syllabus.
  • Likes to go home early.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Value & Structure

  • A waste of money, especially when you live far.
  • you get short changed, less educated.
  • He knows his field but is not a good professor or people person, period.

Theme 3

📈 About Workload & Access

  • You must attend class to get work.
  • Book not used; he gives handouts.
  • he is .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews from 2007-2015 with mixed opinions and some detailed criticism, but the sample is small and partly outdated.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AGOR623 reviews
AGAG911 review
IRRIGATION1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values