AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Marie Carin

NURSE1B · NURS1B · NURS1A · NURS4 · NURSING1B · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

listen closely if you get her, but be ready to teach yourself if lectures fall flat.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing ReviewsLecture Clues for ExamsSelf-Study HeavyStudent Care MixedNursing Clinical Context
  • and .
  • Supporters say she gives and is caring and helpful.
  • Critics say lectures are worthless, she is biased, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

68/100

Positive reviews say listening in lecture and reading is enough to do fine, while negatives focus more on .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Average difficulty sits moderate-low when students listen and read, though .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

At ; no comments claim open optional attendance.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

Half the reviews love her and half , so recommendation hinges on semester and section experience.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

; success is framed more around listening and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

62/100

Comments emphasize lectures and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Equal extremes of best-ever and horrible teaching leave overall quality in the middle.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews imply lecture-linked tests and independent study but do not detail a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person nursing and claims of bias, weak teaching, and self-study necessity.

Main concern

Inconsistent teaching quality and student-support reports make outcomes hard to predict.

What students said

“ !!!! She gives the answers in her lectures so make sure you listen!”
NURSING1B
“ .”
NURS1A
“Horrible!! Poor teaching techniques, has no passion in teaching, and don't expect to learn from her”
NURSE1B
“Be prepared to learn on your own. Very defensive and some times biased!”
NURS1B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Supporters say exam answers appear in lectures; .

Lecture-Based Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments only clearly support .

Lecture-Based Exams
“She gives the answers in her lectures so make sure you listen!”
NURSING1B
“If you read and listen in class you will do fine.”
NURS4

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!! She gives the answers in her lectures so make sure you listen!”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality Split

50/100

“Horrible!! Poor teaching techniques, has no passion in teaching, and don't expect to learn from her”

❤️ Student Support Praise

78/100

“ .”

📖

35/100

“Be prepared to learn on your own. Very defensive and some times biased!”

📝

68/100

“She gives the answers in her lectures so make sure you listen!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • !!!!
  • Lectures are worthless.
  • great teacher, easy on the eyes

Theme 2

❤️ About Character & Care

  • really cares about students
  • She only cares about herself and not the students
  • totally bias

Theme 3

📈 About Learning Path

  • She gives the answers in her lectures so make sure you listen!
  • If you read and listen in class you will do fine.
  • better read and learn on your own

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Six polarized reviews from 2008-2014 provide clear themes but limited recent detail and low grade transparency.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

NURS1B2 reviews
NURS1A1 review
NURS41 review
NURSE1B1 review
NURSING1B1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values