AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Christopher Paul

WORLDREL · WORLDRELG · WORLDRELIGIONS · PHIL12 · PHIL15 · PHIL5 · PHIL · PHILOSOPHY · ETHICS · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Solid pick for an accessible philosophy GE if you read the textbook and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterTake-Home ExamsGenerous GraderLaid-BackClear ExplainerTextbook-Focused
  • Most sections feature take-home exams and .
  • He is widely described as nice and clear, though lectures can feel boring or disorganized.
  • One outlier PHIL5 review called him confusing with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

and if you complete the work and read the text.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is generally manageable, though some ethics concepts and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

as expected or rewarded with rather than fully optional.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students praise his niceness, clarity, and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Students repeatedly call him a doubt.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Light

72/100

Workload centers on textbook reading, pop quizzes, and .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

and a helpful personality outweigh occasional disorganization and boring lectures.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

, and occasional pop quizzes.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person philosophy and ethics sections are mostly easy with , and clear explanations, with occasional complaints about boring or .

Main concern

A and boring.

What students said

“His Ethics class is a very easy A. and he's a .”
PHIL12
“ . Make sure to read the textbook too.”
PHIL5
“class is super boring and you have to go but he gave our class 2 take home tests so it was easy to get an A.”
PHIL5

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

final sometimes done in class, making assessment student-friendly.

Take-Home ExamsTake-Home FinalIn-Class Essay PortionPop Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals, with limited in-class essay work and some pop quizzes.

Take-Home ExamsTake-Home FinalPop QuizzesIn-Class Essay
“ and he's a .”
PHIL12
“He let us do all of our exams as .”
PHIL5

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His Ethics class is a very easy A. and he's a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 in-person reviews spanning 2003-2014, , and teaching clarity. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Pretty good teacher overall. Very helpful and detailed when explaining the material.”

🅰️ Easy A Potential

82/100

“class is super boring and you have to go but he gave our class 2 take home tests so it was easy to get an A.”

📝

86/100

“All of of the final.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and can make a boring class not so boring.
  • He is a nice, laid back professor.
  • Good at explaining hard topics and is respectful of the student's opinions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • His Ethics class is a very easy A.
  • the as hell.
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He has a .
  • He's willing to help clarify concepts and ideas.
  • He is Awesome!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews spanning 2003-2014 with and a friendly style support strong confidence.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL57 reviews
ETHICS2 reviews
PHIL1 review
PHIL121 review
PHIL151 review
Show 4 more courses
PHILOSOPHY1 review
WORLDREL1 review
WORLDRELG1 review
WORLDRELIGIONS1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather_Not_Say 1