AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Vicki Harrison

CHEM50 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless you have no alternative and are ready to teach yourself Chem 50 from the textbook.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesMakes mistakes oftenUnpreparedHarsh on correctionsAvoid if possible
  • and an unprepared teaching style.
  • and fight for .
  • One brief positive outlier exists, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even students who earned and grading .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Chemistry content is hard, and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

limited reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Four of five reviews are strongly negative and urge students to stay away.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

Students report , and personal frustration when challenged.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

because lectures do not prepare students well.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Dominant theme is unprepared, error-filled, confusing teaching that frustrates questions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Tests and points disputes dominate the narrative more than assignment-centered learning.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person Chem 50 is widely described as disorganized and error-prone, with students correcting the instructor and learning mainly from the book.

Main concern

, and poor preparation leave many feeling unready for Chem 51.

What students said

“ !!”
CHEM50
“ and the material was mostly wrong.”
CHEM50
“This is the .”
CHEM50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; students stress hard tests and contested scoring.

Test grading disputesBook-dependent learningNo student-friendly exam format described

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

No explicit proctoring tools are named; , and self-teaching from the book.

Test grading disputesBook-dependent learning
“ and didn't give the .”
CHEM50
“Everything I learned was from the book not from her teaching us.”
CHEM50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, emphasizing consistent negative teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Disaster

18/100

“Horrible teacher. She constantly makes mistakes and takes it personally when you try to correct her.”

👎

18/100

“This is the .”

📚

28/100

“You will have to teach yourself from the book, and you won't be prepared to take Chem 51.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are most of the and all over the place
  • She does not come to class prepared, and seems to wing it
  • and the material was mostly wrong.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I had to put in ALOT of effort to earn an A
  • and didn't give the
  • I had to argue with .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • She also gets very frustrated when you ask a question
  • She throws personal vendettas against students.
  • By the end of the semester half of the class dropped.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews, mostly from 2014, but they are detailed and highly consistent on negative teaching quality.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHEM505 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values