AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Nicholas Mather

PHILI12 · PHIL5 · PHIL12 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can teach yourself from the syllabus and handle uneven communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed Online FeedbackSyllabus-DrivenArrogant ToneSelf-Taught OnlineTerm Paper Required
  • Reviews split between easy-if-you-follow-syllabus online courses and .
  • grading is described as straightforward.
  • A long end-of-term paper and self-teaching online are recurring concerns.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some call it an Easy A if you follow the syllabus, but others struggle with and a long paper.

Online evidence is more negative; as easy.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content can be manageable, but and self-teaching online raise the challenge for some students.

Online review stresses self-teaching difficulty; other reviews emphasize syllabus clarity.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

.

Neither online nor .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

38/100

A few say you will do fine if organized, but others call him rude, arrogant, or the .

Online review is strongly negative; in-person-tagged comments are mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

errors fixed if you cite sources.

Format shift

Online student reported B-; other reviews say follow the syllabus and do fine.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Weekly quizzes and readings are manageable for some, but a 7-12 page term paper adds late-course load.

Format shift

Term paper noted mainly in in-person-tagged online-course comments.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Students cite arrogance, rudeness, and weak online support more often than strong teaching.

Format shift

Online review is the harshest; personality complaints appear in other reviews too.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Weekly quizzes and a .

Format shift

Applies across the mixed online and in-person-tagged comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as straightforward and easy if you follow the syllabus, though several note arrogance and a major term paper.

Main concern

Cold communication and a .

What students said

“Pretty straightforward. Easy if you go exactly by the syllabus.”
PHIL5
“He comes off arrogant and like he is too good for you”
PHIL12
“ . he is very rude”
PHILI12

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The labeled online review calls him the tied to readings and heavy self-teaching.

Main concern

readings.

What students said

“By far the .”
PHIL5
“ readings”
PHIL5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on weekly quizzes and long term paper.

Weekly QuizzesSyllabus-BasedTerm Paper

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews describe straightforward syllabus-based quizzes and least one course.

Syllabus-Based QuizzesTerm Paper
“Very straight forward with assignments and grading.”
PHIL12
“AND you have a 7-12 page term paper due at the end of the class.”
PHIL12

Online

Online quizzes may include questions outside weekly readings, increasing self-teaching pressure.

Weekly QuizzesOff-Reading Questions
“ readings and since it was an online class it made it even more difficult.”
PHIL5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far the . I was excited about philosophy till I took this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting online friction, syllabus ease, and personality concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“By far the .”

📘 Syllabus Path

60/100

“Pretty straightforward. Easy if you go exactly by the syllabus.”

🗣️ Personality Concerns

30/100

“he is very rude”

🅰️ Easy A Claim

70/100

“Easy A”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I'm basically teaching myself
  • Very straight forward with assignments and grading
  • He comes off arrogant

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy if you go exactly by the syllabus
  • readings
  • Easy A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • he is very rude
  • not very friendly
  • too good for you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews with mixed formats and some format-tag mismatch lower certainty, but themes of syllabus clarity versus cold personality are consistent.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL53 reviews
PHIL121 review
PHILI121 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values