AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

E Jackiw

PHIL5 · PHIL8 · PHIL9 · PHILO9 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless and tolerate delayed grades; online may be less painful than in person.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedLate GradingSelf-Teach HeavyHard to FollowAvoid In Person
  • , and late on grades.
  • Workload and .
  • The lone online review is milder with light coursework and an earned A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even capable students , and essays with little instruction.

Online student got an A with lighter work; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Material and delivery leave many lost, with long readings and broad finals.

In-person difficulty dominates; one online review found material not exactly difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

but still pretty crucial for understanding.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most reviewers urge running away , and weak guidance.

Online is more neutral; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

Grading standards are unclear more than openly harsh; .

Format shift

; online is quieter on leniency.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Nightly reading, homework, papers, and .

Format shift

In-person reports boatloads of work; online called comparatively light.

Teaching experience

Poor

26/100

Students say he is smart and nice but unorganized, , and unhelpful when asked.

Format shift

In-person teaching is strongly negative; online experience is middling.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and comprehensive finals.

Format shift

and final online; and broad finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as , and heavy, with students forced to teach themselves.

Main concern

and as a semester-end surprise.

What students said

“Run from this class if you see it in the open section.”
PHILO9
“ !!!”
PHIL5

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online PHIL8 student earned an A with and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“Comparatively light coursework.”
PHIL8

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

finals covering everything ever mentioned.

Comprehensive FinalsPapers With Little InstructionOnline Midterm and Final OptionNo Multiple Choice Final

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

multiple choice and sparse guidance.

Comprehensive FinalPapersNo Multiple Choice
“a choice”
PHILO9
“ ”
PHILO9

Online

and final with optional written portion on campus; .

Online MidtermOnline FinalOptional On-Campus Written
“Midterm and on campus.”
PHIL8

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Run from this class if you see it in the open section.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews (1 online, 9 in person), highlighting disorganization and self-teaching burden. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

22/100

“ !!!”

📂 Late or Missing Grades

28/100

“he never let's you know where you stand grade wise.”

🧠

26/100

“Plan on studying a lot and doing and self teaching.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Unorganized. Doesn't answer questions with an answer just rambles on about what he expects.
  • He's completely useless! He doesn't help! He doesn't guide!
  • Great teacher! I took him over the winter.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Workload

  • boat loads of work and he will never grades anything on time.
  • You'll have to read 25-40 pgs a night
  • Comparatively light coursework.

Theme 3

⚠️

  • Your grade will be a surprise at the end of the semester
  • everyone else in the class is completely LOST!
  • He's a bit slow on responding to emails, but .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews spanning 2008-2013 are consistent on disorganization and , though only one is online.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

PHILO94 reviews
PHIL53 reviews
PHIL82 reviews
PHIL91 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values