AI Rate Professor

Aeronautics

Richard Young

AERO23 · TRAN17 · AERO27 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take him for TRAN17 if you want an easy pass; if grades matter.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCourseDependentFunnyButVagueHarshOnAeroEasyTran17MixedOutcomes
  • TRAN17 is easy with no failing grades and strong praise.
  • AERO23 and AERO27 draw hard grading and .
  • Personality is liked more than teaching clarity in tougher courses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

TRAN17 is nearly a free pass with no fails, but AERO courses are graded hard with many Cs and fails.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Air transportation feels easy with light projects, while aero courses feel high-difficulty and test-heavy.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Highly recommended for TRAN17, but students warn others to stay away for AERO.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Grading is generous in TRAN17 but harsh in AERO with many low grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

TRAN17 has easy projects; AERO workload is less detailed but difficulty ratings are high.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Students like his humor and personality, yet call teaching vague and weak in aero courses.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

and grade risk, with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person experience splits sharply by course: TRAN17 feels easy and friendly while AERO classes feel vague and harshly graded.

Main concern

Course choice matters more than the professor brand; AERO sections can tank grades.

What students said

“When I took his class, he failed NO ONE! There were no failing grades.”
TRAN17
“HE GRADES TOO HARD FOR AERO 23..... STAY AWAY FROM TEACHER”
AERO23
“He was vague on what would be on the test.”
AERO27

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams drive outcomes and students say he is vague about what will be tested.

Vague test contentGrade-critical exams

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and hard grading in AERO sections.

Vague test contentHard grading on AERO exams
“He was vague on what would be on the test.”
AERO27
“HE GRADES TOO HARD FOR AERO 23..... STAY AWAY FROM TEACHER”
AERO23

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to learn and not . If you care what you get in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews spanning 2011-2012, highlighting course-dependent teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“In class he is a very funny guy to know. However teaching wise he is not that great.”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“ if Mr. Tracey's Tran 17 class is full! !”

⚖️

48/100

“THERE WERE TOO MANY C's and some failing grades. U HAVE BEEN WARNED =0!”

Theme 1

✈️ About Easy TRAN17

  • Easy Air Transportation Class!
  • he failed NO ONE! There were no failing grades.
  • Nice dude!

Theme 2

⚠️ About AERO Grades

  • HE GRADES TOO HARD FOR AERO 23
  • He was vague on what would be on the test.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only four old reviews from 2011-2012 with split courses and no grade data reduce confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

TRAN172 reviews
AERO231 review
AERO271 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values