AI Rate Professor

English & Literature

Jean Garret

ENGL67 · ENG68 · ENG67 · ENGENG · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

Avoid unless you want a brutal English skills grind and can deliver near-perfect work every time.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExtremely HardHarsh GraderPoints Off Tiny MistakesStrict AttendanceHeavy Essays
  • Students repeatedly call the class very hard with and essays.
  • Tiny mistakes cost full credit or and hard to succeed.
  • Attendance and ; almost every .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students say tiny mistakes wipe out whole answers or cost 5 points each, and hard work still produced only a C.

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Near-universal hard ratings with comments that she jams content in and the class is not easy.

Difficulty .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and absent, and one student was kicked out when a phone rang.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Multiple students and that .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Tiny mistakes cost full credit or ; and essays.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of essays and difficulty.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Students feel she , and runs an odd punitive class rather than supportive teaching.

Format shift

Low quality ratings dominate the in-person sample.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Homework, essays, and exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person English courses feel extremely hard, perfectionist, and unforgiving, with heavy essay and , and absences.

Main concern

Perfectionist scoring and punitive point deductions make success feel nearly impossible for average students.

What students said

“If the whole answer wrong.”
ENG67
“Horrible alot of essays 5 pts off for every mistake even the smallest little thing making it easy to fail and hard to succeed”
ENGENG
“ .. or you'll fail instantly.”
ENG68

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; overall assessment climate is strict and unforgiving.

Perfectionist HomeworkEssay Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence emphasizes perfect homework and clearly described exam format.

Perfectionist HomeworkEssay Heavy
“Horrible alot of essays 5 pts off for every mistake even the smallest little thing making it easy to fail and hard to succeed”
ENGENG
“ .. or you'll fail instantly.”
ENG68

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . DON'T DON'T DON'T.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews (0 online), highlighting harsh grading, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

12/100

“ . DON'T DON'T DON'T.”

📉

12/100

“5 pts off for every mistake even the smallest little thing making it easy to fail and hard to succeed”

🔥 Extreme Difficulty

12/100

“Hard hard hard if but she will jam it in to you”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If the whole answer wrong.
  • I worked hard and got a C.
  • .. or you'll fail instantly.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character & Class Climate

  • This instructor i feel does not care about the students.
  • She kicked me out because my phone rang.
  • Just a very odd and uneventful class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six fairly consistent negative reviews from 2009-2012 with , though sample is still modest and older.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG673 reviews
ENG681 review
ENGENG1 review
ENGL671 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values