AI Rate Professor

Information Science

Scott Botterud

CNET50 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Only take him if you already know basics and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProClear LecturesImpatientCritical Lab GraderNeeds Prior KnowledgeLimited Hands-On
  • Lectures on and detailed when questions are asked.
  • He is impatient and expects prior computer foundation even in an intro major course.
  • and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

and the intro course still expects prior computer foundation.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Difficulty is rated 4 and students say you need computer foundations before this intro class.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Lectures are solid but , and thin hands-on work make him a mixed fit.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

only available review.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Labs matter and hands-on projects are limited, so workload is not light but not clearly overwhelming.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and weak support for true beginners.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person CNET50 review praises lecture explanations but , and lack of hands-on work.

Main concern

Impatience and .

What students said

“Very good at explaining in the lecture part in regards to how a computer works and a detailed answer when questions are asked.”
CNET50
“However, he is very impatient and you need to have a foundation of computers to be stepping in this class”
CNET50
“Lack of hands-on projects and grades the .”
CNET50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

No clear exam policy stated

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Comments focus on lectures and .

Critical lab gradingLimited hands-on projects
“Lack of hands-on projects and grades the .”
CNET50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very good at explaining in the lecture part in regards to how a computer works and a detailed answer when questions are asked. However, he is very impatient and you need to have a foundation of computers to be stepping in this class”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting . Credibility rating: Low.

🗣️ Lecture Clarity

70/100

“Very good at explaining in the lecture part in regards to how a computer works and a detailed answer when questions are asked.”

😤 Student Support

30/100

“he is very impatient and you need to have a foundation of computers to be stepping in this class”

📝

32/100

“Lack of hands-on projects and grades the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very good at explaining in the lecture part in regards to how a computer works
  • he is very impatient

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you need to have a foundation of computers to be stepping in this class
  • grades the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one old review with no grade or , so conclusions rest on a single voice.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CNET501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values