AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Scott Bullock

MATH51 · MATH71 · MATH110 · MATH50 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Solid pick if you keep up with homework and can handle a fast lecture pace.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHomework-based testsFast-paced lecturesClear when engagedEasy if you studyMixed personality reviews
  • and review problems, so .
  • and helpful, but a few report rude or monotone delivery.
  • Pace can feel fast and , so .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students report easy tests if and review problems, with some mentioning A grades.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, but fast pacing and skipped steps add some intellectual load.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but missing class can make you fall behind on fast lectures.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Most reviews recommend him for clarity and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and and study are done.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Workload

Light

74/100

and test prep; little mention of heavy projects.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

and supportive, but .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

and review .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person math sections feel ; lectures can run fast and quality varies by student.

Main concern

Occasional rude tone or rushed hard topics can leave weaker students behind.

What students said

“ . and collects it at the end of the semester.”
MATH51
“ up with his speedy teaching.”
MATH50
“This guy is horrible and rude. and doesn't like to explain things.”
MATH71

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and similar review problems, so preparation is straightforward.

Homework-aligned testsReview problem similarityStudy and practice focus

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

if you study; problems often match homework or review sets.

Homework-aligned testsSimilar review problems
“ because he tells you what problems would be SIMILAR on the test.”
MATH71
“you need a book and if !”
MATH50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . and collects it at the end of the semester. Great Attitude, very down to earch, and has a high desire to see his students pass. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person reviews spanning 2007-2011, highlighting teaching clarity, exam alignment, and mixed tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“He is a great professor. Mt. SAC needs more of these professors teaching math. and works well with students to see them pass!”

📈 Easy If You Study

78/100

“Cool teacher! . you need a book and test are easy if !”

⚡ Fast Pace Risk

40/100

“He is an awesome professor who knows his math so highly that because he can.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and works well with students
  • VERY MONOTONE, BUT HIS CLASS WAS EASY ENOUGH TO FOLLOW

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if u study
  • Got an A twice and hope to continue to do so

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Great Attitude, very down to earch
  • This guy is horrible and rude
  • has stories where he admits his downfalls in math as a student

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve older in-person reviews with mixed detail and some inconsistency lower confidence despite a .

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH506 reviews
MATH713 reviews
MATH512 reviews
MATH1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values