AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Li Lei

MATHMATH · MATH51B · MATH71 · MATH51 · STATS110 · MATH110 · MATH50 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid if ; only consider if and survive tough, high-stakes exams.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesHarsh test gradingOften late to classHard exams heavy on finalDo not take warnings
  • Students and many fail.
  • Tests and small mistakes.
  • Almost every review urges taking a different professor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students report , and , so an A requires heavy effort with low payoff.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Material becomes hard because , and students must learn elsewhere.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews rarely detail a , though many say class itself feels pointless.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Nearly every and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Multiple students say and quizzes too hard and marks off for ridiculous mistakes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Homework volume is high and as 45 percent of the course.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Comments cluster around unclear lectures, being late, board mistakes, and expecting students to teach themselves.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tests and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math and stats sections are described as , and graded hard, with many students failing or seeking tutoring instead.

Main concern

worth a huge share of the grade.

What students said

“BAD professor. Not motivating at all. . Does not make simple things understandable. Most students fail.”
MATH51
“ , and she grades tough. .”
MATH110
“If u r here 2 b taught, this is not the teacher 4 u.”
STATS110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as intentionally hard with and a .

Hard testsHarsh gradingFinal worth 45 percentNo late work

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes are repeatedly called hard and harshly graded, with one final at 45 percent of the grade.

Hard testsHarsh gradingFinal worth 45 percent
“Her final is worth 45% of your overall grade, so if got an A and you fail the !”
MATH71
“she grades too hard on the test and quizzes”
MATH51B
“hw is easy but , and she does not grade them well.”
MATH110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . really boring, slow, late. i could not understand what she was saying half the time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews, , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“Does not make simple things understandable. Most students fail.”

📉 Recommendation

18/100

“ .”

📝

28/100

“Her final is worth 45% of your overall grade”

⚖️

22/100

“she grades too hard on the test and quizzes”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • she rushes through lessons.
  • Shes late alot of the time.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • , and she grades tough
  • Most students fail
  • marks you down for ridiculous things

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendations

  • .
  • .
  • if

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Eight consistently negative in-person reviews give a , but they are all older (2008-2010) with limited grade detail.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1102 reviews
MATH501 review
MATH511 review
MATH51B1 review
MATH711 review
Show 2 more courses
MATHMATH1 review
STATS1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values